Literature DB >> 16584811

Perceptions of food risk management among key stakeholders: results from a cross-European study.

Ellen van Kleef1, Lynn J Frewer, George M Chryssochoidis, Julie R Houghton, Sara Korzen-Bohr, Thanassis Krystallis, Jesper Lassen, Uwe Pfenning, Gene Rowe.   

Abstract

In designing and implementing appropriate food risk management strategies, it is important to examine how key stakeholders perceive both the practice and effectiveness of food risk management. The objective of this study is to identify similarities and differences in perceptions of, and attitudes to, food risk management practices held by consumers and experts with an interest in food safety. Focus groups were conducted in five European countries chosen for their (hypothesised) cultural differences in attitudes towards risk: Denmark, Germany, Greece, Slovenia and the UK. Content analysis was carried out on the resulting texts and (sub) categories were identified within the analysis framework to facilitate the capture of emerging themes. Five key themes were identified as common to the perceptions of both consumers and experts, although these are not represented in the same way by both groups. These key themes are: (1) efforts made by the responsible authorities to manage food risks; (2) responsibility for prevention and management of food risks; (3) how priorities are established within regulatory systems; (4) scientific progress and its implications for food risk management; and (5) media attention and food safety incidents. Although some similarities emerged between the groups, differences were also identified. For example, experts appeared to be highly negative about media influences, whereas consumers appeared more indifferent about media influences and motives. These different perspectives need to be addressed in order to reduce the perceptual distance between key stakeholders, and in particular, to enhance consumer confidence in the food risk management system. Based on the study findings, recommendations for food risk management policies are outlined.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16584811     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2006.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  10 in total

1.  Technical assistance in the field of risk communication.

Authors:  Laura Maxim; Mario Mazzocchi; Stephan Van den Broucke; Fabiana Zollo; Tobin Robinson; Claire Rogers; Domagoj Vrbos; Giorgia Zamariola; Anthony Smith
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-04-29

2.  Perceptions about mercury and lead in fish consumed in Lake Albert fishing communities Uganda.

Authors:  Tamale Andrew; Ejobi Francis; Muyanja Charles; Irene Naigaga; Nakavuma Jesca; Ocaido Micheal; Katuhoire Anne; Amulen Deborah
Journal:  Cogent Food Agric       Date:  2016-08-17

3.  Food fraud and the perceived integrity of European food imports into China.

Authors:  H Kendall; P Naughton; S Kuznesof; M Raley; M Dean; B Clark; H Stolz; R Home; M Y Chan; Q Zhong; P Brereton; L J Frewer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  European Consumers' Perceptions and Attitudes towards Non-Thermally Processed Fruit and Vegetable Products.

Authors:  Xiao Song; Paola Pendenza; María Díaz Navarro; Elisa Valderrama García; Rossella Di Monaco; Davide Giacalone
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2020-11-25

5.  Responsibility of citizens in food safety social co-governance in the context of China.

Authors:  Linhai Wu; Ke Qin; Xiujuan Chen
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-08-02

6.  Trust makers, breakers and brokers: building trust in the Australian food system.

Authors:  Annabelle Wilson; John Coveney; Julie Henderson; Samantha Meyer; Michael Calnan; Martin Caraher; Trevor Webb; Anthony Elliott; Paul Ward
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Avian Influenza-Factors Affecting Consumers' Purchase Intentions toward Poultry Products.

Authors:  Xiaowei Wen; Sangluo Sun; Lin Li; Qinying He; Fu-Sheng Tsai
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  What is the qualitative evidence concerning the risks, diagnosis, management and consequences of gastrointestinal infections in the community in the United Kingdom? A systematic review and meta-ethnography.

Authors:  Suzanne Rotheram; Jessie Cooper; Sara Ronzi; Benjamin Barr; Margaret Whitehead
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  What Is Safe and How Much Does It Matter? Food Vendors' and Consumers' Views on Food Safety in Urban Nigeria.

Authors:  Stella Nordhagen; James Lee; Nwando Onuigbo-Chatta; Augustine Okoruwa; Eva Monterrosa; Elisabetta Lambertini; Gretel H Pelto
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-01-14

10.  "Sometimes You Get Good Ones, and Sometimes You Get Not-so-Good Ones": Vendors' and Consumers' Strategies to Identify and Mitigate Food Safety Risks in Urban Nigeria.

Authors:  Stella Nordhagen; James Lee; Nwando Onuigbo-Chatta; Augustine Okoruwa; Eva Monterrosa; Elisabetta Lambertini; Gretel H Pelto
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-01-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.