Literature DB >> 16584427

Implementation of peripheral blood CD34 analyses to initiate leukapheresis: marked reduction in resource utilization.

Kenneth R Meehan1, John M Hill, Linda Patchett, Susan M Webber, Jillian Wu, Pamela Ely, Zbigniew M Szczepiorkowski.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Analysis of the peripheral blood (PB) C34 value may determine the optimal time to initiate leukapheresis. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: After selecting a threshold PB CD34 value of five CD34 + cells per microL to initiate leukapheresis procedure, a prospective analysis of 50 consecutive patients was initiated to identify the optimal time to initiate leukapheresis and its impact on costs and resource utilization. Clinical decisions were made to commence or to postpone leukapheresis with this PB CD34 threshold number. Based on PB CD34 values for each patient, the number of leukapheresis procedures, postponed or canceled, the number of CD34+ cells per kg, and the total number of cells collected were identified. Costs of mobilization were obtained from the hospital cost accounting system.
RESULTS: In 13 months, 50 patients with a hematologic disorder underwent mobilization. There were 34 cancellations or postponements of collections due to a low PB CD34 value in 13 patients. By use of our identified costs per initial collection, this resulted in a savings of 67,660 US dollars.
CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study defines how the implementation of the PB CD34 value results in costs savings. A low PB CD34 value canceled or postponed a significant number of leukapheresis procedures, resulting in a substantial cost savings. Use of the PB CD34 value should be the standard of care during mobilization and peripheral blood progenitor cell collection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16584427     DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00774.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  3 in total

Review 1.  A review of transfusion practice before, during, and after hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation.

Authors:  James L Gajewski; Viviana V Johnson; S Gerald Sandler; Antoine Sayegh; Thomas R Klumpp
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Economic evaluation of plerixafor for stem cell mobilization.

Authors:  Steven M Kymes; Iskra Pusic; Dennis L Lambert; Martin Gregory; Kenneth R Carson; John F DiPersio
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  Chemical Stability of Plerixafor after Opening of Single-Use Vial.

Authors:  Jack T Seki; Andrea Bozovic; Roy Lee; Rita Kwong; Eshetu G Atenafu; Anna Xu; Jin-Hyeun Huh
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2017-08-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.