Literature DB >> 16583441

Corroboration of mechanoregulatory algorithms for tissue differentiation during fracture healing: Comparison with in vivo results.

Hanna Isaksson1, Corrinus C van Donkelaar, Rik Huiskes, Keita Ito.   

Abstract

Several mechanoregulation algorithms proposed to control tissue differentiation during bone healing have been shown to accurately predict temporal and spatial tissue distributions during normal fracture healing. As these algorithms are different in nature and biophysical parameters, it raises the question of which reflects the actual mechanobiological processes the best. The aim of this study was to resolve this issue by corroborating the mechanoregulatory algorithms with more extensive in vivo bone healing data from animal experiments. A poroelastic three-dimensional finite element model of an ovine tibia with a 2.4 mm gap and external callus was used to simulate the course of tissue differentiation during fracture healing in an adaptive model. The mechanical conditions applied were similar to those used experimentally, with axial compression or torsional rotation as two distinct cases. Histological data at 4 and 8 weeks, and weekly radiographs, were used for comparison. By applying new mechanical conditions, torsional rotation, the predictions of the algorithms were distinguished successfully. In torsion, the algorithms regulated by strain and hydrostatic pressure failed to predict healing and bone formation as seen in experimental data. The algorithm regulated by deviatoric strain and fluid velocity predicted bridging and healing in torsion, as observed in vivo. The predictions of the algorithm regulated by deviatoric strain alone did not agree with in vivo data. None of the algorithms predicted patterns of healing entirely similar to those observed experimentally for both loading modes. However, patterns predicted by the algorithm based on deviatoric strain and fluid velocity was closest to experimental results. It was the only algorithm able to predict healing with torsional loading as seen in vivo. Copyright 2006 Orthopaedic Research Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16583441     DOI: 10.1002/jor.20118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  23 in total

1.  Tissue differentiation and bone regeneration in an osteotomized mandible: a computational analysis of the latency period.

Authors:  A Boccaccio; P J Prendergast; C Pappalettere; D J Kelly
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  "May the force be with you": 14th Samuel Haughton lecture.

Authors:  P J Prendergast
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2008-07-19       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Prediction of fracture healing under axial loading, shear loading and bending is possible using distortional and dilatational strains as determining mechanical stimuli.

Authors:  Malte Steiner; Lutz Claes; Anita Ignatius; Frank Niemeyer; Ulrich Simon; Tim Wehner
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Tissue differentiation in an in vivo bioreactor: in silico investigations of scaffold stiffness.

Authors:  Hanifeh Khayyeri; Sara Checa; Magnus Tägil; Fergal J O'Brien; Patrick J Prendergast
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  The connection between cellular mechanoregulation and tissue patterns during bone healing.

Authors:  Felix Repp; Andreas Vetter; Georg N Duda; Richard Weinkamer
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Mechanical microenvironments and protein expression associated with formation of different skeletal tissues during bone healing.

Authors:  Gregory J Miller; Louis C Gerstenfeld; Elise F Morgan
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2015-03-31

Review 7.  A review of computational models of bone fracture healing.

Authors:  Monan Wang; Ning Yang; Xinyu Wang
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Correlations between local strains and tissue phenotypes in an experimental model of skeletal healing.

Authors:  Elise F Morgan; Kristy T Salisbury Palomares; Ryan E Gleason; Daniel L Bellin; Karen B Chien; Ginu U Unnikrishnan; Pui L Leong
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Limitation of finite element analysis of poroelastic behavior of biological tissues undergoing rapid loading.

Authors:  Ian A Stokes; Salman Chegini; Stephen J Ferguson; Mack G Gardner-Morse; James C Iatridis; Jeffrey P Laible
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Optical acquisition and polar decomposition of the full-field deformation gradient tensor within a fracture callus.

Authors:  Wangdo Kim; Sean S Kohles
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.