Literature DB >> 16580531

Impact of body mass index on cardiac mortality in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease undergoing myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography.

Xingping Kang1, Leslee J Shaw, Sean W Hayes, Rory Hachamovitch, Aiden Abidov, Ishac Cohen, John D Friedman, Louise E J Thomson, Donna Polk, Guido Germano, Daniel S Berman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (MPS).
BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of MPS in the obese has not been evaluated.
METHODS: We studied 4,720 patients with and 10,019 patients without known coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent rest Tl-201/stress Tc-99m sestamibi MPS, including 5,233 gated MPS studies and followed up (mean 2.7 to 3.2 years). Patients were categorized as normal weight (BMI 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2), overweight (BMI 25.0 to 29.9 kg/m2), or obese (BMI > or =30.0 kg/m2).
RESULTS: Unadjusted annual rates of cardiac death (CD) rose versus stress MPS abnormalities in all weight groups (p < 0.001). Obese or overweight patients with or without known CAD who had normal MPS were at low CD risk (<1%/year), similar to normal weight patients. In CAD, obese and overweight patients with abnormal MPS had lower rates of CD compared with normal weight patients (p < 0.01). In patients with low ejection fraction (EF) by gated MPS, those with normal weight had highest CD rate (p = 0.001). Multivariable models revealed that BMI was not a predictor of CD in suspected CAD patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95 to 1.02) but was an independent inverse predictor of CD in known CAD patients (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.92 to 0.98), especially in women, adenosine stress, low EF, or abnormal perfusion.
CONCLUSIONS: Normal MPS was associated with low risk of CD in patients of all weight categories. In patients with known CAD undergoing MPS, obese and overweight patients were at lower risk of CD over three years than normal weight patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16580531     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  12 in total

Review 1.  Prognosis in the era of comparative effectiveness research: where is nuclear cardiology now and where should it be?

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Fadi G Hage; Daniel S Berman; Rory Hachamovitch; Ami Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Are people with normal radionuclide perfusion imaging studies better-off if they are obese?

Authors:  Farbod Raiszadeh; Mark I Travin
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Body mass index and the prevalence, severity, and risk of coronary artery disease: an international multicentre study of 13,874 patients.

Authors:  Troy M Labounty; Millie J Gomez; Stephan Achenbach; Mouaz Al-Mallah; Daniel S Berman; Matthew J Budoff; Filippo Cademartiri; Tracy Q Callister; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Victor Cheng; Kavitha M Chinnaiyan; Benjamin Chow; Ricardo Cury; Augustin Delago; Allison Dunning; Gudrun Feuchtner; Martin Hadamitzky; Jorg Hausleiter; Philipp Kaufmann; Yong-Jin Kim; Jonathon Leipsic; Fay Y Lin; Erica Maffei; Gilbert Raff; Leslee J Shaw; Todd C Villines; James K Min
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 4.  Optimising diagnostic accuracy with the exercise ECG: opportunities for women and men with stable ischaemic heart disease.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Joe X Xie; Lawrence M Phillips; Abhinav Goyal; Harmony R Reynolds; Daniel S Berman; Michael H Picard; Balram Bhargava; Gerard Devlin; Bernard R Chaitman
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2016-06-01

5.  Predicting heart failure hospitalization and mortality by quantitative echocardiography: is body surface area the indexing method of choice? The Heart and Soul Study.

Authors:  Bryan Ristow; Sadia Ali; Beeya Na; Mintu P Turakhia; Mary A Whooley; Nelson B Schiller
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 5.251

6.  Feasibility of SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in the super-obese using a multi-head semiconductor camera with attenuation correction.

Authors:  Anthony E DeCicco; Alexis B Sokil; Gregary D Marhefka; Kirk Reist; Christopher L Hansen
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Impact of weight on long-term survival among patients without known coronary artery disease and a normal stress SPECT MPI.

Authors:  Seth Uretsky; Azhar Supariwala; Padmakshi Singh; Prashanth Atluri; Surinder S Khokhar; Hari K Koppuravuri; Rajeev Joshi; Anupa Mandeva; Alan Rozanski
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 8.  Weight science: evaluating the evidence for a paradigm shift.

Authors:  Linda Bacon; Lucy Aphramor
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 3.271

9.  Survival of the fattest: unexpected findings about hyperglycaemia and obesity in a population based study of 75-year-olds.

Authors:  Göran Nilsson; Pär Hedberg; John Öhrvik
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2011-04-10       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Automated quantitative analysis of CZT SPECT stratifies cardiovascular risk in the obese population: Analysis of the REFINE SPECT registry.

Authors:  Eyal Klein; Robert J H Miller; Tali Sharir; Andrew J Einstein; Mathews B Fish; Terrence D Ruddy; Philipp A Kaufmann; Albert J Sinusas; Edward J Miller; Timothy M Bateman; Sharmila Dorbala; Marcelo Di Carli; Yuka Otaki; Heidi Gransar; Joanna X Liang; Damini Dey; Daniel S Berman; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.