Literature DB >> 16580530

Multislice computed tomography for detection of patients with aortic valve stenosis and quantification of severity.

Gudrun M Feuchtner1, Wolfgang Dichtl, Guy J Friedrich, Mathias Frick, Hannes Alber, Thomas Schachner, Johannes Bonatti, Ammar Mallouhi, Thomas Frede, Otmar Pachinger, Dieter zur Nedden, Silvana Müller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether multislice computed tomography (MSCT) provides a reliable, noninvasive imaging modality for identification of patients with degenerative aortic valve stenosis (AS) by quantifying the aortic valve area (AVA) in comparison to the accepted diagnostic standard transthoracic echocardiography (TTE).
BACKGROUND: Management of patients with degenerative AS is based on the severity of disease. The severity of AS in clinical practice is assessed by TTE and classified as mild, moderate, or severe according to the AVA.
METHODS: Forty-six patients were examined with contrast-enhanced, electrocardiogram-gated, 16-row MSCT for the evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy. In 30 patients, quantification of the AVA with MSCT was compared to TTE using the continuity equation with Doppler velocity-time integral for calculation of the AVA.
RESULTS: Sensitivity of MSCT for the identification of patients with degenerative AS was 100%, and the specificity was 93.7%. Thirty of 46 patients had AS determined by TTE. Quantification of AVA by MSCT (mean AVA = 0.94 cm2) in patients with AS showed a good correlation to TTE (r = 0.89; p < 0.001). Bland-Altman plot illustrated good intermodality agreement between the two methods (limits of agreement, 0.20; 0.29).
CONCLUSIONS: Multislice computed tomography may provide an accurate, noninvasive imaging technique for detection of patients with AS and quantification of AVA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16580530     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  29 in total

1.  Automatic vs semi-automatic global cardiac function assessment using 64-row CT.

Authors:  J Greupner; E Zimmermann; B Hamm; M Dewey
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Clinical indications for cardiac computed tomography. From the Working Group of the Cardiac Radiology Section of the Italian Society of Medical Radiology (SIRM).

Authors:  E di Cesare; I Carbone; A Carriero; M Centonze; F De Cobelli; R De Rosa; P Di Renzi; A Esposito; R Faletti; R Fattori; M Francone; A Giovagnoni; L La Grutta; G Ligabue; L Lovato; R Marano; M Midiri; L Natale; A Romagnoli; V Russo; F Sardanelli; F Cademartiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Dual-step prospective ECG-triggered 128-slice dual-source CT for evaluation of coronary arteries and cardiac function without heart rate control: a technical note.

Authors:  Gudrun Feuchtner; Robert Goetti; Andrè Plass; Stephan Baumueller; Paul Stolzmann; Hans Scheffel; Monika Wieser; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi; Sebastian Leschka
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Cardiac imaging in valvular heart disease.

Authors:  W S Choo; R P Steeds
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Quantitative analysis of left ventricular dyssynchrony using cardiac computed tomography versus three-dimensional echocardiography.

Authors:  Sebastian J Buss; Felix Schulz; David Wolf; Waldemar Hosch; Christian Galuschky; Georg Schummers; Evangelos Giannitsis; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Christian Zugck; Ruediger Becker; Stefan E Hardt; Hugo A Katus; Grigorios Korosoglou
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-01-22       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for the detection of coronary stenosis: do we really have to focus on "stenoses"?

Authors:  Christof Burgstahler; Stephen Schroeder
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  The utility of computed tomography in the context of aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Gudrun M Feuchtner
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Aortic valves stenosis and regurgitation: assessment with dual source computed tomography.

Authors:  Xiaofei Li; Lijun Tang; Lei Zhou; Yuqing Duan; Sheng Yanhui; Rong Yang; Yanhu Wu; Xiangqing Kong
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  [Investigation techniques and importance of CT for diagnostics of cardiac valvular diseases].

Authors:  S Gordic; H Alkadhi
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.635

10.  Aortic valve area assessed with 320-detector computed tomography: comparison with transthoracic echocardiography.

Authors:  Linnea Hornbech Larsen; Klaus Fuglsang Kofoed; Helle Gervig Carstensen; Mads Rams Mejdahl; Mads Jønsson Andersen; Jesper Kjaergaard; Olav Wendelboe Nielsen; Lars Køber; Rasmus Møgelvang; Christian Hassager
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.