Literature DB >> 16580000

Accuracy of an optical active-marker system to track the relative motion of rigid bodies.

Lorin P Maletsky1, Junyi Sun, Nicholas A Morton.   

Abstract

The measurement of relative motion between two moving bones is commonly accomplished for in vitro studies by attaching to each bone a series of either passive or active markers in a fixed orientation to create a rigid body (RB). This work determined the accuracy of motion between two RBs using an Optotrak optical motion capture system with active infrared LEDs. The stationary noise in the system was quantified by recording the apparent change in position with the RBs stationary and found to be 0.04 degrees and 0.03 mm. Incremental 10 degrees rotations and 10-mm translations were made using a more precise tool than the Optotrak. Increasing camera distance decreased the precision or increased the range of values observed for a set motion and increased the error in rotation or bias between the measured and actual rotation. The relative positions of the RBs with respect to the camera-viewing plane had a minimal effect on the kinematics and, therefore, for a given distance in the volume less than or close to the precalibrated camera distance, any motion was similarly reliable. For a typical operating set-up, a 10 degrees rotation showed a bias of 0.05 degrees and a 95% repeatability limit of 0.67 degrees. A 10-mm translation showed a bias of 0.03 mm and a 95% repeatability limit of 0.29 mm. To achieve a high level of accuracy it is important to keep the distance between the cameras and the markers near the distance the cameras are focused to during calibration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16580000     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  28 in total

1.  Digital stereophotogrammetry based on circular markers and zooming cameras: evaluation of a method for 3D analysis of small motions in orthopaedic research.

Authors:  Evgenij Bobrowitsch; Christof Hurschler; Gavin Olender; Christian Plaass; Hazibullah Waizy; Heino Arnold; Christina Stukenborg-Colsman
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.819

2.  Choosing among 3 ankle-foot orthoses for a patient with stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction.

Authors:  Christopher G Neville; Jeff R Houck
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.751

3.  Agreement between fiber optic and optoelectronic systems for quantifying sagittal plane spinal curvature in sitting.

Authors:  Beth A Cloud; Kristin D Zhao; Ryan Breighner; Hugo Giambini; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 4.  Lessons learned from the last 20 years of ACL-related in vivo-biomechanics research of the knee joint.

Authors:  Evangelos Pappas; Franceska Zampeli; Sofia A Xergia; Anastasios D Georgoulis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Deep posterior compartment strength and foot kinematics in subjects with stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction.

Authors:  Christopher Neville; Adolph S Flemister; Jeff R Houck
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.827

6.  Biomechanical properties of posterior transpedicular-transdiscal oblique lumbar screw fixation with novel trapezoidal lateral interbody spacer: an in vitro human cadaveric model.

Authors:  Ai-Min Wu; Jonathan A Harris; John C Hao; Sean M Jenkins; Yong-Long Chi; Brandon S Bucklen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Validation of predicted patellofemoral mechanics in a finite element model of the healthy and cruciate-deficient knee.

Authors:  Azhar A Ali; Sami S Shalhoub; Adam J Cyr; Clare K Fitzpatrick; Lorin P Maletsky; Paul J Rullkoetter; Kevin B Shelburne
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  The Impact of ACL Laxity on a Bicondylar Robotic Knee and Implications in Human Joint Biomechanics.

Authors:  Felix Russell; Petar Kormushev; Ravi Vaidyanathan; Peter Ellison
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Lower spinal postural variability during laptop-work in subjects with cervicogenic headache compared to healthy controls.

Authors:  Sarah Mingels; Wim Dankaerts; Ludo van Etten; Liesbeth Bruckers; Marita Granitzer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Computational knee ligament modeling using experimentally determined zero-load lengths.

Authors:  Katherine H Bloemker; Trent M Guess; Lorin Maletsky; Kevin Dodd
Journal:  Open Biomed Eng J       Date:  2012-04-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.