Literature DB >> 16575176

Lessons from comparative analysis of species-specific imprinted genes.

K Okamura1, T Ito.   

Abstract

Genomic imprinting is generally believed to be conserved in all mammals except for egg-laying monotremes, suggesting that it is closely related to placental and fetal growth. As expected, the imprinting status of most imprinted genes is conserved between mouse and human, and some are imprinted even in marsupials. On the other hand, a small number of genes were reported to exhibit species-specific imprinting that is not necessarily accounted for by either the placenta or conflict hypotheses. Since mouse and human represent a single, phylogenetically restricted clade in the mammalian class, a much broader comparison including mammals diverged earlier than rodents is necessary to fully understand the species-specificity and variation in evolution of genomic imprinting. Indeed, comparative analysis of a species-specific imprinted gene Impact using a broader range of mammals led us to propose an alternative dosage control hypothesis for the evolution of genomic imprinting. 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16575176     DOI: 10.1159/000090828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res        ISSN: 1424-8581            Impact factor:   1.636


  11 in total

Review 1.  The opossum genome: insights and opportunities from an alternative mammal.

Authors:  Paul B Samollow
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Convergent and divergent evolution of genomic imprinting in the marsupial Monodelphis domestica.

Authors:  Radhika Das; Nathan Anderson; Maryellen I Koran; Jennifer R Weidman; Tarjei S Mikkelsen; Michael Kamal; Susan K Murphy; Kerstin Linblad-Toh; John M Greally; Randy L Jirtle
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 3.969

3.  DNA sequence polymorphisms within the bovine guanine nucleotide-binding protein Gs subunit alpha (Gsα)-encoding (GNAS) genomic imprinting domain are associated with performance traits.

Authors:  Klaudia M Sikora; David A Magee; Erik W Berkowicz; Donagh P Berry; Dawn J Howard; Michael P Mullen; Ross D Evans; David E Machugh; Charles Spillane
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 2.797

4.  Assessment of genomic imprinting of SLC38A4, NNAT, NAP1L5, and H19 in cattle.

Authors:  Ismail Zaitoun; Hasan Khatib
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 2.797

Review 5.  Genomic imprinting in mammals: emerging themes and established theories.

Authors:  Andrew J Wood; Rebecca J Oakey
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-11-24       Impact factor: 5.917

6.  Detecting parent of origin and dominant QTL in a two-generation commercial poultry pedigree using variance component methodology.

Authors:  Suzanne J Rowe; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Christopher S Haley; Sara A Knott; Dirk-Jan De Koning
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2009-01-05       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  A first-stage approximation to identify new imprinted genes through sequence analysis of its coding regions.

Authors:  Elias Daura-Oller; Maria Cabré; Miguel A Montero; José L Paternáin; Antoni Romeu
Journal:  Comp Funct Genomics       Date:  2009-04-08

8.  Expression profile and transcription factor binding site exploration of imprinted genes in human and mouse.

Authors:  Christine Steinhoff; Martina Paulsen; Szymon Kielbasa; Jörn Walter; Martin Vingron
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Characterization of the differentially methylated region of the Impact gene that exhibits Glires-specific imprinting.

Authors:  Kohji Okamura; Richard F Wintle; Stephen W Scherer
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Comparative analysis of sequence characteristics of imprinted genes in human, mouse, and cattle.

Authors:  Hasan Khatib; Ismail Zaitoun; Eui-Soo Kim
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 2.957

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.