Literature DB >> 16572562

Normal ranges of variability for urodynamic studies of neurogenic bladders in spinal cord injury.

Franklin H Chou1, Chester H Ho, M B Chir, Todd A Linsenmeyer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
OBJECTIVE: Urodynamic studies are conducted on a regular basis to evaluate changes in bladder function after spinal cord injury. Often, differences in urodynamic parameters exist from one study or one year to the next. The objective of this study was to provide reference ranges for "normal" variability in urodynamic parameters that can be considered as "no real change" from one study to the next.
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review.
METHODS: Fifty consecutive individuals with spinal cord injury had 2 trials (trial 1 and trial 2) of urodynamic studies done 5 minutes apart, and the following data were collected: maximum cystometric capacity, opening pressure, maximum detrusor pressure, volume voided, and postvoid residual. The corresponding data were compared, and the frequency distribution for the change between consecutive studies was plotted. Because there is no standard, variability ranges for 5th to 95th, 10th to 90th, and 25th to 75th percentiles were calculated to give health care providers more choices.
RESULTS: Ranges of variability are as follows in the following format (urodynamic parameter; mean value; +, maximum increase; -, maximum decrease)--5th to 95th percentile: cystometric capacity (234.63 mL, +213.50 mL, -158.05 mL); opening pressure (54.56 cmH2O, +30 cmH2O, -18.00 cmH2O); maximum detrusor pressure (60.82 cmH2O, +17.35 cmH2O, -27.80 cmH2O); volume voided (122.20 mL, +177.25 mL, -176.00 mL); postvoid residual (176.06 mL, +197.25 mL, -118.00 mL); 10th to 90th percentile: cystometric capacity (234.63 mL, +126.40 mL, -74.60 mL); opening pressure (54.56 cmH2O, +13.70 cmH2O, -12.00 cmH2O); maximum detrusor pressure (60.82 cmH2O, +10.00 cmH2O, -20.00 cmH2O); volume voided (122.20 mL, +105.60 mL, -82.00 mL); postvoid residual (176.06 mL, +131.00 mL, -86.00 mL); 25th to 75th percentile: cystometric capacity (234.63 mL, +72.00 mL, -27.00 mL); opening pressure (54.56 cmH2O, +4.00 cmH2O, -9.50 cmH2O; maximum detrusor pressure (60.82 cmH2O, +4.00 cmH2O, -10.00 cmH2O); volume voided (122.20 mL, +50.00 mL, -30.00 mL); postvoid residual (176.06 mL, +50.00 mL, -30.00 mL).
CONCLUSIONS: Urodynamic studies have variability. Knowing these ranges of variability can be helpful in determining whether differences between filling trial 1 and filling trial 2 in a single study or year-to-year changes in urodynamic studies are significant or simply the normal variability of the urodynamic study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16572562      PMCID: PMC1864790          DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2006.11753853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med        ISSN: 1079-0268            Impact factor:   1.985


  13 in total

1.  APS recommendations for the urological evaluation of patients with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  T A Linsenmeyer; D Culkin
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Urodynamic findings in adults with the tethered cord syndrome.

Authors:  J L Giddens; S B Radomski; E D Hirshberg; M Hassouna; M Fehlings
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Urodynamic investigations in healthy fertile females during the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  S Sørensen; U B Knudsen; H J Kirkeby; J C Djurhuus
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl       Date:  1988

4.  Urodynamic investigations and their reproducibility in healthy postmenopausal females.

Authors:  S Sørensen
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl       Date:  1988

5.  Long term reproducibility of urodynamic investigations in healthy fertile females.

Authors:  S Sørensen; H Gregersen; S M Sørensen
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl       Date:  1988

6.  A critical review of urodynamic investigations in spinal cord injury patients.

Authors:  J J Wyndaele
Journal:  Paraplegia       Date:  1984-06

7.  Patterns of bladder recovery in spinal injury evaluated by serial urodynamic observations.

Authors:  M R Butler
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Early predictors of bladder recovery and urodynamics after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  P J Shenot; D A Rivas; T Watanabe; M B Chancellor
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.696

Review 9.  Urodynamics of spinal cord injury.

Authors:  T Watanabe; D A Rivas; M B Chancellor
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.241

10.  The reproducibility of urodynamic studies of neurogenic bladders in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  C H Ho; T A Linsenmeyer; S R Millis
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.985

View more
  8 in total

1.  Influence of bladder lithiasis on lower urinary tract dynamics in patients with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  M Vírseda-Chamorro; J Salinas-Casado; Á Barroso-Manso; P Gutiérrez-Martín; M E Fuertes
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Urodynamic Management of Neurogenic Bladder in Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  R Khanna; A S Sandhu; D Doddamani
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

3.  Neurogenic Bladder and Urodynamic Outcomes in Patients with Spinal Cord Myelopathy.

Authors:  Peter W New; Louise Dillon
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2015-07-29

4.  The assessment of bladder and urethral function in spinal cord injury patients.

Authors:  Zhong Chen; Shuangquan Sun; Rongjin Deng; Dan Cai; Xiaoyi Yuan; Guanghui Du; Weimin Yang; Zhangqun Ye
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2009-10-11

Review 5.  Impact of bladder dysfunction in the management of post radical prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence-a review.

Authors:  Derek B Hennessey; Nathan Hoag; Johan Gani
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-07

6.  Correlation between Heart Rate Variability and Bladder Sensations During Filling and Voiding Phase of Urodynamic Study in Patients with Myelopathy.

Authors:  Tenzil Gomez; Anupam Gupta; U K Rashmi Krishnan; Anirban Chakraborty; Talakad Narasappa Sathyaprabha; K Thennarasu
Journal:  Ann Indian Acad Neurol       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.383

7.  The Description of Urodynamic Study for Bladder Dysfunction in Compressive Myelo- or Radiculo-pathy: A Prospective Study in an Institutional Setup.

Authors:  Nayil Khursheed; Bilal Pahalwan; Humam Nisar; Altaf Ramzan; Saleem Wani; Abrar Wani; Sarbjit Singh; Rouf Khawaja; Arif Hamid; Hussain Arif; Baldev Singh
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

8.  Exoskeleton gait training to improve lower urinary tract function in people with motor-complete spinal cord injury: A randomized pilot trial.

Authors:  Alison M M Williams; Emily Deegan; Matthias Walter; Lynn Stothers; Tania Lam
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 2.912

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.