Literature DB >> 16571740

An optimization principle for determining movement duration.

Hirokazu Tanaka1, John W Krakauer, Ning Qian.   

Abstract

Movement duration is an integral component of motor control, but nearly all extant optimization models of motor planning prefix duration instead of explaining it. Here we propose a new optimization principle that predicts movement duration. The model assumes that the brain attempts to minimize movement duration under the constraint of meeting an accuracy criterion. The criterion is task and context dependent but is fixed for a given task and context. The model determines a unique duration as a trade-off between speed (time optimality) and accuracy (acceptable endpoint scatter). We analyzed the model for a linear motor plant, and obtained a closed-form equation for determining movement duration. By solving the equation numerically with specific plant parameters for the eye and arm, we found that the model can reproduce saccade duration as a function of amplitude (the main sequence), and arm-movement duration as a function of the ratio of target distance to size (Fitts's law). In addition, it explains the dependency of peak saccadic speed on amplitude and the dependency of saccadic duration on initial eye position. Furthermore, for arm movements, the model predicts a scaling relationship between peak velocity and distance and a reduction in movement duration with a moderate increase in viscosity. Finally, for a linear plant, our model predicts a neural control signal identical to that of the minimum-variance model set to the same movement duration. This control signal is a smooth function of time (except at the endpoint), in contrast to the discontinuous bang-bang control found in the time-optimal control literature. We suggest that one aspect of movement planning, as revealed by movement duration, may be to assign an endpoint accuracy criterion for a given task and context.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16571740     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00751.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  38 in total

1.  Trajectory of human movement during sit to stand: a new modeling approach based on movement decomposition and multi-phase cost function.

Authors:  Mohsen Sadeghi; Mehran Emadi Andani; Fariba Bahrami; Mohamad Parnianpour
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Endpoint accuracy for a small and a large hand muscle in young and old adults during rapid, goal-directed isometric contractions.

Authors:  Brach Poston; Joel A Enoka; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Vestibular guidance of active head movements.

Authors:  Nadine Lehnen; Ulrich Büttner; Stefan Glasauer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Timing in talking: what is it used for, and how is it controlled?

Authors:  Alice Turk; Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Primary motor cortical activity during unimanual movements with increasing demand on precision.

Authors:  Deborah A Barany; Kate Pirog Revill; Alexandra Caliban; Isabelle Vernon; Ashwin Shukla; K Sathian; Cathrin M Buetefisch
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  A computational model for optimal muscle activity considering muscle viscoelasticity in wrist movements.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kambara; Duk Shin; Yasuharu Koike
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Choosing the fastest movement: perceiving speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Authors:  Scott J Young; Jay Pratt; Tom Chau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Movement trajectory smoothness is not associated with the endpoint accuracy of rapid multi-joint arm movements in young and older adults.

Authors:  Brach Poston; Arend W A Van Gemmert; Siddharth Sharma; Somesh Chakrabarti; Shahrzad H Zavaremi; George Stelmach
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2013-04-10

9.  Time perception during apparent biological motion reflects subjective speed of movement, not objective rate of visual stimulation.

Authors:  Guido Orgs; Louise Kirsch; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Movement timing and invariance arise from several geometries.

Authors:  Daniel Bennequin; Ronit Fuchs; Alain Berthoz; Tamar Flash
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.