OBJECTIVE: To investigate the factor structure of a ten-item version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD-10). METHOD: Two hundred and thirty-one Chinese persons aged 60-92 were individually interviewed with the CESD-10. The data were subject to confirmatory factor analysis testing several competing models. The one-factor model hypothesizes that all ten items are loaded on a single factor. In the two-factor model, positive affect items are loaded on one factor, and the remaining items on the other. The three-factor model distinguishes between positive affect, depressed affect, and somatic symptoms. RESULTS: The three-factor model was the best fitting model, with a comparative fit index of 0.95 and a standardized root mean square residual of 0.06. Depressed affect and somatic symptoms were highly correlated, and both were moderately correlated with positive affect. Nonetheless, all three factors appeared to tap a common underlying construct of depression-when a higher-order construct of depression was allowed to explain the intercorrelations of the three factors, depressed affect loaded at 0.88, somatic symptoms loaded at 0.92, and positive affect loaded at 0.51, on the higher-order construct. CONCLUSION: The data provided support for the factorial validity of the CESD-10. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the factor structure of a ten-item version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD-10). METHOD: Two hundred and thirty-one Chinese persons aged 60-92 were individually interviewed with the CESD-10. The data were subject to confirmatory factor analysis testing several competing models. The one-factor model hypothesizes that all ten items are loaded on a single factor. In the two-factor model, positive affect items are loaded on one factor, and the remaining items on the other. The three-factor model distinguishes between positive affect, depressed affect, and somatic symptoms. RESULTS: The three-factor model was the best fitting model, with a comparative fit index of 0.95 and a standardized root mean square residual of 0.06. Depressed affect and somatic symptoms were highly correlated, and both were moderately correlated with positive affect. Nonetheless, all three factors appeared to tap a common underlying construct of depression-when a higher-order construct of depression was allowed to explain the intercorrelations of the three factors, depressed affect loaded at 0.88, somatic symptoms loaded at 0.92, and positive affect loaded at 0.51, on the higher-order construct. CONCLUSION: The data provided support for the factorial validity of the CESD-10. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors: Grant N Colfax; Glenn-Milo Santos; Moupali Das; Deirdre McDermott Santos; Tim Matheson; James Gasper; Steve Shoptaw; Eric Vittinghoff Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2011-11
Authors: Phillip O Coffin; Glenn-Milo Santos; Jaclyn Hern; Eric Vittinghoff; Deirdre Santos; Tim Matheson; Grant Colfax; Steven L Batki Journal: Addiction Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Caitlin M Turner; Phillip Coffin; Deirdre Santos; Shannon Huffaker; Tim Matheson; Jason Euren; Anna DeMartini; Chris Rowe; Steven Batki; Glenn-Milo Santos Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2017-01-25
Authors: Mohammadreza Mohebbi; Van Nguyen; John J McNeil; Robyn L Woods; Mark R Nelson; Raj C Shah; Elsdon Storey; Anne M Murray; Christopher M Reid; Brenda Kirpach; Rory Wolfe; Jessica E Lockery; Michael Berk Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2017-08-18 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Dagmar Amtmann; Jiseon Kim; Hyewon Chung; Alyssa M Bamer; Robert L Askew; Salene Wu; Karon F Cook; Kurt L Johnson Journal: Rehabil Psychol Date: 2014-03-24
Authors: Phillip Oliver Coffin; Glenn-Milo Santos; Moupali Das; Deirdre M Santos; Shannon Huffaker; Tim Matheson; James Gasper; Eric Vittinghoff; Grant N Colfax Journal: Addiction Date: 2013-01-03 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Phillip O Coffin; Glenn-Milo Santos; Jaclyn Hern; Eric Vittinghoff; John E Walker; Tim Matheson; Deirdre Santos; Grant Colfax; Steven L Batki Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2020-03-01 Impact factor: 21.596