Literature DB >> 16569458

Do transposable elements really contribute to proteomes?

Valer Gotea1, Wojciech Makałowski.   

Abstract

Recent studies indicate that the initial classification of transposable elements (TEs) as 'useless', 'selfish' or 'junk' pieces of DNA is not an accurate one. TEs seem to have complex regulatory functions and contribute to the coding regions of many genes. Because this contribution had been documented only at transcript level, we searched for evidence that would also support the translation of TE cassettes. Our findings suggest that the proportion of proteins with TE-encoded fragments (approximately 0.1%), although probably underestimated, is much less than what the data at transcript level suggest (approximately 4%). In all cases, the TE cassettes are derived from old TEs, consistent with the idea that incorporation (exaptation) of TE fragments into functional proteins requires long evolutionary periods. We therefore argue that functional proteins are unlikely to contain TE cassettes derived from young TEs, the role of which is probably limited to regulatory functions.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16569458     DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2006.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Genet        ISSN: 0168-9525            Impact factor:   11.639


  43 in total

Review 1.  The role of Alu elements in the cis-regulation of RNA processing.

Authors:  Chammiran Daniel; Mikaela Behm; Marie Öhman
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  Comparison of multiple vertebrate genomes reveals the birth and evolution of human exons.

Authors:  Xiang H-F Zhang; Lawrence A Chasin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  The birth of new exons: mechanisms and evolutionary consequences.

Authors:  Rotem Sorek
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 4.942

Review 4.  DNA transposons and the evolution of eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Cédric Feschotte; Ellen J Pritham
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 16.830

5.  LINE-1 retrotransposons: mediators of somatic variation in neuronal genomes?

Authors:  Tatjana Singer; Michael J McConnell; Maria C N Marchetto; Nicole G Coufal; Fred H Gage
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 6.  Retroelements and their impact on genome evolution and functioning.

Authors:  Elena Gogvadze; Anton Buzdin
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2009-08-02       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  Characterization of human gene locus CYYR1: a complex multi-transcript system.

Authors:  Raffaella Casadei; Maria Chiara Pelleri; Lorenza Vitale; Federica Facchin; Silvia Canaider; Pierluigi Strippoli; Matteo Vian; Allison Piovesan; Eva Bianconi; Elisa Mariani; Francesco Piva; Flavia Frabetti
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 2.316

8.  Retrotransposon activation contributes to fragile X premutation rCGG-mediated neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Huiping Tan; Abrar Qurashi; Mickael Poidevin; David L Nelson; He Li; Peng Jin
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  Inherent promoter bidirectionality facilitates maintenance of sequence integrity and transcription of parasitic DNA in mammalian genomes.

Authors:  Paul Kalitsis; Richard Saffery
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  The protist Trichomonas vaginalis harbors multiple lineages of transcriptionally active Mutator-like elements.

Authors:  Fabrício R Lopes; Joana C Silva; Marlene Benchimol; Gustavo G L Costa; Gonçalo A G Pereira; Claudia M A Carareto
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.