Literature DB >> 16568472

Prognostic impact of molecular markers in a series of 220 primary glioblastomas.

Caroline Houillier1, Julie Lejeune, Alexandra Benouaich-Amiel, Florence Laigle-Donadey, Emmanuelle Criniere, Karima Mokhtari, Joelle Thillet, Jean-Yves Delattre, Khe Hoang-Xuan, Marc Sanson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In contrast to oligodendrogliomas, molecular predictors of prognosis have not been consistently found in glioblastomas. However, genetic studies show that glioblastomas consist of several genetic subtypes and raise the possibility that molecular alterations could be predictive of survival.
METHODS: A search for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) on chromosome 1p, 9p, 10q, 19q, EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor), CDK4, and MDM2 (mouse double minute) amplifications, CDKN2A (INK4A/ARF) homozygous deletions, p53 expression, was performed in a series of 220 primary glioblastomas. The molecular alterations were then correlated with each other to identify distinct molecular pathways and with clinical parameters and the course of the disease to identify prognostic markers.
RESULTS: Nonrandom associations were found between EGFR amplification and LOH10q, LOH9p, and INK4A/ARF deletion, LOH1p and LOH19q, and MDM2 and CDK4 amplification, whereas mutual exclusions were found between p53 expression and EGFR amplification, LOH 9p/INK4A/ARF homozygous deletion, and MDM2 and CDK4 amplification. Age (P = 4.10(-5)) and performance status (P = .003) were the main predictors of outcome. In contrast, molecular markers were of limited impact: MDM2 amplification correlated with poor outcome on both univariate and multivariate analysis (P = .01) and EGFR amplification with good prognosis on multivariate analysis (P = .02).
CONCLUSION: Despite their limited prognostic impact, the genetic markers investigated here outline distinct molecular pathways involved in glioblastoma tumorigenesis and warrant broader molecular screening. Copyright 2006 American Cancer Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16568472     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  45 in total

Review 1.  Molecularly targeted therapies for malignant gliomas.

Authors:  Andreas A Argyriou; Haralabos P Kalofonos
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.354

2.  Detailed characterization of alterations of chromosomes 7, 9, and 10 in glioblastomas as assessed by single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays.

Authors:  Inês Crespo; Ana Luísa Vital; Ana Belen Nieto; Olinda Rebelo; Hermínio Tão; Maria Celeste Lopes; Catarina Resende Oliveira; Pim J French; Alberto Orfao; María Dolores Tabernero
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  Chromosome 9p and 10q losses predict unfavorable outcome in low-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Caroline Houillier; Karima Mokhtari; Catherine Carpentier; Emmanuelle Crinière; Yannick Marie; Audrey Rousseau; Gentian Kaloshi; Caroline Dehais; Julien Laffaire; Florence Laigle-Donadey; Khê Hoang-Xuan; Marc Sanson; Jean-Yves Delattre
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 4.  Targeting oncogenic ALK and MET: a promising therapeutic strategy for glioblastoma.

Authors:  Gerald C Wallace; Yaenette N Dixon-Mah; W Alex Vandergrift; Swapan K Ray; Catherine P Haar; Amber M Mittendorf; Sunil J Patel; Naren L Banik; Pierre Giglio; Arabinda Das
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.584

5.  EGFRvIII expression and PTEN loss synergistically induce chromosomal instability and glial tumors.

Authors:  Li Li; Amalia Dutra; Evgenia Pak; Joseph E Labrie; Rachel M Gerstein; Pier Paolo Pandolfi; Larry D Recht; Alonzo H Ross
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  Something old and something new about molecular diagnostics in gliomas.

Authors:  Craig Horbinski
Journal:  Surg Pathol Clin       Date:  2012-12-01

7.  How molecular testing can help (and hurt) in the workup of gliomas.

Authors:  Kenneth Clark; Zoya Voronovich; Craig Horbinski
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.493

8.  An ANOCEF genomic and transcriptomic microarray study of the response to radiotherapy or to alkylating first-line chemotherapy in glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  François Ducray; Aurélien de Reyniès; Olivier Chinot; Ahmed Idbaih; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Carole Colin; Lucie Karayan-Tapon; Hervé Chneiweiss; Michel Wager; François Vallette; Yannick Marie; David Rickman; Emilie Thomas; Jean-Yves Delattre; Jérôme Honnorat; Marc Sanson; François Berger
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 27.401

9.  Frequency and clinical significance of chromosome 7 and 10 aneuploidies, amplification of the EGFR gene, deletion of PTEN and TP53 genes, and 1p/19q deficiency in a sample of adult patients diagnosed with glioblastoma from Southern Brazil.

Authors:  Dayane B Koshiyama; Patrícia Trevisan; Carla Graziadio; Rafael F M Rosa; Bibiana Cunegatto; Juliete Scholl; Valentina O Provenzi; Alexandre P de Sá; Fabiano P Soares; Maíra C Velho; Nelson de A P Filho; Ceres A Oliveira; Paulo R G Zen
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Long-Term Survival of a Patient with Giant Cell Glioblastoma: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  E Naydenov; V Bussarsky; S Nachev; S Hadjidekova; D Toncheva
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol       Date:  2009-07-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.