OBJECTIVE: Primary aldosteronism is the most common endocrine form of secondary hypertension, but no single test or imaging method always identifies it. Identification of a unilateral overproduction of aldosterone due to Conn's adenoma or unilateral hyperplasia is of utmost importance to the surgeon. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed our experience with primary aldosteronism in 46 consecutive patients who had undergone adrenalectomy at the Surgical Pathology Institute, University of Padua since 1993. All the patients underwent a CT scan. Adrenal venous sampling was performed in those patients with negative or equivocal findings on imaging studies. RESULTS: Computed tomography was non-contributory in 12 patients and frankly misleading in 2 patients, demonstrating a probable mass lesion in the contralateral but not in the ipsilateral adrenal. Eighteen patients had selective venous sampling that was successful in altering the management of 14 cases. Eleven patients who biochemically had an adrenal adenoma, had normal/equivocal CT, while the remaining 3 had bilateral or contralateral adrenal masses. Venous sampling localized aldosterone secretion and an adenoma, less than 1 cm in diameter, was removed, curing their hypertension. Eleven patients were treated by open adrenalectomy and 35 by the lateral transperitoneal laparoscopic approach. Histological examination revealed 45 Conn's adenomas, of which 13 had a diameter of less than 1 cm (range 0.3-0.8), and 1 case of nodular hyperplasia. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who have equivocal or unexpected CT findings should proceed to hormonal localization. Adrenal venous sampling is essential in patients with equivocal CT scans to avoid unnecessary and inappropriate adrenalectomy.
OBJECTIVE: Primary aldosteronism is the most common endocrine form of secondary hypertension, but no single test or imaging method always identifies it. Identification of a unilateral overproduction of aldosterone due to Conn's adenoma or unilateral hyperplasia is of utmost importance to the surgeon. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed our experience with primary aldosteronism in 46 consecutive patients who had undergone adrenalectomy at the Surgical Pathology Institute, University of Padua since 1993. All the patients underwent a CT scan. Adrenal venous sampling was performed in those patients with negative or equivocal findings on imaging studies. RESULTS: Computed tomography was non-contributory in 12 patients and frankly misleading in 2 patients, demonstrating a probable mass lesion in the contralateral but not in the ipsilateral adrenal. Eighteen patients had selective venous sampling that was successful in altering the management of 14 cases. Eleven patients who biochemically had an adrenal adenoma, had normal/equivocal CT, while the remaining 3 had bilateral or contralateral adrenal masses. Venous sampling localized aldosterone secretion and an adenoma, less than 1 cm in diameter, was removed, curing their hypertension. Eleven patients were treated by open adrenalectomy and 35 by the lateral transperitoneal laparoscopic approach. Histological examination revealed 45 Conn's adenomas, of which 13 had a diameter of less than 1 cm (range 0.3-0.8), and 1 case of nodular hyperplasia. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who have equivocal or unexpected CT findings should proceed to hormonal localization. Adrenal venous sampling is essential in patients with equivocal CT scans to avoid unnecessary and inappropriate adrenalectomy.
Authors: G P Rossi; A Sacchetto; M Chiesura-Corona; R De Toni; M Gallina; G P Feltrin; A C Pessina Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: G P Rossi; E Rossi; E Pavan; N Rosati; R Zecchel; A Semplicini; F Perazzoli; A C Pessina Journal: Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) Date: 1998-12 Impact factor: 3.478
Authors: Antonio Toniato; Isabella Boschin; Paolo Bernante; Mirto Foletto; Anna Maria Guolo; Maria Rosa Pelizzo; Giuseppe Opocher; Enzo Ballotta; Franco Mantero Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2008-07-15 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Gregory A Kline; Adrian Harvey; Charlotte Jones; Michael H Hill; Benny So; Nairne Scott-Douglas; Janice L Pasieka Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2008-08-12 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: Jens Waldmann; Lisa Maurer; Julia Holler; Peter H Kann; Annette Ramaswamy; Detlef K Bartsch; Peter Langer Journal: World J Surg Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Myung Kwan Ko; Chan Sung Park; Sung Soo Byun; Jung Min Hong; Mu Yeol Lee; Kyung Hoon Kim; Yang Won Na; Hye Jeong Choi; Il Sung Nam-Goong; Young Il Kim; Eun Sook Kim Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2013-03-04 Impact factor: 2.153