Literature DB >> 16568004

Hybrid component fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Friedrich Bottner1, Richard Laskin, Russell E Windsor, Steven B Haas.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We retrospectively analyzed the midterm survivor rate of revision total knee arthroplasty using hybrid stem fixation. We included 33 patients, 21 women and 12 men with an average age of 68 years (range, 57-80 years). Revision was performed for aseptic loosening in 16 patients, aseptic loosening and knee instability in five patients, instability in seven patients, infection in three patients, and postoperative stiffness and pain in two patients. The average follow-up was 38 months. Three knees (9%) were revised during the follow-up period. Two patients (6%) underwent revision for aseptic loosening and one patient (3%) for deep implant infection. The average knee score improved from 42 points (range, 10 to 60) to 83 points (range, 60 to 100). The average functional score improved from 48 points (range, 15-65 points) to 76 points (range, 46-99 points). All patients had no pain (13%) or moderate/occasional pain (87%) during walking. The average ROM improved from 94 degrees (range, 45 degrees-125 degrees) to 105 degrees (range, 70 degrees-125 degrees). Hybrid component fixation is a useful treatment option in revision total knee arthroplasty. The revision rate for aseptic loosening within a three year follow-up is 6%. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV (case series). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16568004     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000214418.36959.c5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  14 in total

Review 1.  Fixation of revision TKA: a review of the literature.

Authors:  J Beckmann; C Lüring; R Springorum; F X Köck; J Grifka; M Tingart
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Modified hybrid stem fixation in revision TKA is durable at 2 to 10 years.

Authors:  Alexander P Sah; Sanjai Shukla; Craig J Della Valle; Aaron G Rosenberg; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Results of press-fit stems in revision knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Gavin C Wood; Douglas D R Naudie; Steven J MacDonald; Richard W McCalden; Robert B Bourne
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Fixation of stem in revision of total knee arthroplasty: cemented versus cementless-a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Changyao Wang; Tilman Pfitzner; Philipp von Roth; Hermann O Mayr; Michael Sostheim; Robert Hube
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Novel metaphyseal porous titanium cones allow favorable outcomes in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ittai Shichman; Christian Oakley; Jore H Willems; Gijs G van Hellemondt; Petra Heesterbeek; Joshua Rozell; Scott Marwin; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 2.928

6.  Are cementless stems more durable than cemented stems in two-stage revisions of infected total knee arthroplasties?

Authors:  Paul K Edwards; Thomas K Fehring; William G Hamilton; Brett Perricelli; Walter B Beaver; Susan M Odum
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Incidence, indications, outcomes, and survivorship of stems in primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Brian T Barlow; Kathryn K Oi; Yuo-Yu Lee; Amethia D Joseph; Michael M Alexiades
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Results of revision total knee arthroplasty using press-fit cementless stem.

Authors:  Maurício Masasi Iamaguchi; Fernando Bley Vicente de Castro; Riccardo Gomes Gobbi; Luis Eduardo Passarelli Tirico; José Ricardo Pécora; Gilberto Luis Camanho
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 0.513

9.  2- to 9-year outcome of stemmed total knee arthroplasty. Similar failure rates in patients when used primary or as a revision.

Authors:  Rüdiger J Weiss; Martin Thorsell; André Stark; Josefina Nyvang; Margareta Hedström
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  TIBIAL COMPONENT IN REVISION OF TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY: COMPARISON BETWEEN CEMENTED AND HYBRID FIXATION.

Authors:  Francisco Fontes Cintra; Anthony Kerbes Yepéz; Marcos Gilbert Sucena Rasga; Marcelo Abagge; Paulo Gilberto Cimbalista Alencar
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-12-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.