Literature DB >> 16565656

Quality and completeness of histopathology reports of rectal cancer resections. Results of an audit in Brittany.

Yannick Eon1, Jean-Yves Le Douy, Bernard Lamer, Jean Battini, Jean-François Bretagne.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Few data are available in France about implementation of guidelines for pathology reports of rectal cancer resections. AIM: The purpose of this study was to audit quality and completeness of histopathology reports of rectal cancer resections in Brittany by comparing results with French guidelines published in 1998.
METHODS: All inhabitants in Brittany who were beneficiaries of the general health insurance system and who underwent surgery for rectal cancer between February 1999 and January 2000 were included in the study. Twenty-one pathology laboratories, including 14 private laboratories, participated in this study. All pathology reports were examined by two physician-consultants of the health insurance system trained in the analysis of pathology reports (search for consigned or missing data). Results were compared with guidelines published in 1998.
RESULTS: Of 234 pathology reports, 204 (84%) mentioned the number of examined lymph nodes and 217 (93%) the number of those found positive. The criterion of at least 8 examined lymph nodes was noted in 53.4% of reports. Longitudinal margin involvement was recorded in 92% of reports and circumferential margin involvement in 27% only. Venous and/or lymphatic and neural invasion were recorded in 34% and 18% of reports, respectively. Tumor staging was made by using UICC (pTNM) in 67% of reports.
CONCLUSION: This study shows that the quality and completeness of histopathology reports of rectal cancer resections could be improved in Brittany. Despite its documented value as an important predictor of local recurrence, circumferential margin involvement is too frequently omitted. Standardisation of the examination procedures and exhaustive reporting would be useful to improve practice quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16565656     DOI: 10.1016/s0399-8320(06)73159-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin Biol        ISSN: 0399-8320


  5 in total

1.  An international survey-based study on colorectal cancer pathology reporting-guidelines versus local practice.

Authors:  Maria Urbanowicz; Heike I Grabsch; Frederic Fiteni; Yan Liu; Carmela Caballero; Jean-François Fléjou
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 2.  Quality assurance in pathology in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis—European recommendations.

Authors:  Phil Quirke; Mauro Risio; René Lambert; Lawrence von Karsa; Michael Vieth
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Risk factors, short and long term outcome of anastomotic leaks in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Olof Jannasch; Tim Klinge; Ronny Otto; Costanza Chiapponi; Andrej Udelnow; Hans Lippert; Christiane J Bruns; Pawel Mroczkowski
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-11-03

Review 4.  The effects of implementing synoptic pathology reporting in cancer diagnosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Caro E Sluijter; Luc R C W van Lonkhuijzen; Henk-Jan van Slooten; Iris D Nagtegaal; Lucy I H Overbeek
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  An audit of histopathology reports of carcinoma endometrium: experience from a tertiary referral center.

Authors:  K K Deodhar; B Rekhi; S Menon; B Ganesh
Journal:  J Postgrad Med       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.476

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.