Literature DB >> 1656538

Hepatic transplantation for primary and metastatic cancers of the liver.

I Penn1.   

Abstract

Long-term results of transplantation for primary and metastatic hepatic malignancies were evaluated retrospectively in 637 patients. Recurrence rates and 2-year and 5-year patient survival rates were calculated. The overall recurrence rate was 40%, with 81% of deaths from recurrence occurring within 2 years after transplantation. Best results were obtained with uncommon tumors: incidental hepatomas (13% recurrence; 57% 2-year and 5-year follow-up); epithelioid hemangioendotheliomas (33% recurrence; 82% and 43% 2-year and 5-year survival); hepatoblastomas (33% recurrence; 50% 2-year and 5-year survival); and fibrolamellar hepatomas (39% recurrence; 60% and 55% 2-year and 5-year survival). Hemangiosarcomas had 64% recurrence, and all patients died within 27.5 months. Tumors metastatic to the liver had 59% recurrence, with 38% and 21% 2-year and 5-year survival rates. Transplantation should be abandoned for hemangiosarcomas and most metastatic tumors, except possibly for some slowly growing neuroendocrine tumors. The usual hepatomas had 39% recurrence with 2-year and 5-year survival rates of 30% and 18%, respectively. Cholangiocarcinomas had 44% recurrences with 2-year and 5-year survival rates of 30% and 17%, respectively. Transplantation for hepatomas and cholangiocarcinomas should be reserved for patients with favorable risk factors or when combined with well-defined chemotherapy protocols before and after operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1656538

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  87 in total

1.  Indications for referral and assessment in adult liver transplantation: a clinical guideline. British Society of Gastroenterology.

Authors:  J Devlin; J O'Grady
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Liver transplantation for metastatic neuroendocrine tumor: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Wojciech C Blonski; K Rajender Reddy; Abraham Shaked; Evan Siegelman; David C Metz
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  See Ching Chan
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 11.740

4.  Simultaneous pancreatectomy and liver transplantation: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Rajeev Dhupar; Michael E de Vera; J Wallis Marsh; Paulo A Fontes; Jennifer L Steel; Herbert J Zeh; T Clark Gamblin
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Proceed with caution: liver transplantation for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  S J Knechtle; M Kalayoglu; A M D'Alessandro; L F Rikkers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Long-term outcomes following liver transplantation for hepatic hemangioendothelioma: the UNOS experience from 1987 to 2005.

Authors:  Joel A Rodriguez; Natasha S Becker; Christine A O'Mahony; John A Goss; Thomas A Aloia
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a registry report of the impact of tumor characteristics on outcome.

Authors:  G B Klintmalm
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Acute liver failure due to lymphoma. A diagnostic concern when considering liver transplantation.

Authors:  G M Woolf; L M Petrovic; S E Rojter; F G Villamil; L Makowka; L G Podesta; L S Sher; L Memsic; J M Vierling
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Hepatic resection for metastatic gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: outcome and prognostic predictors.

Authors:  D Gomez; H Z Malik; A Al-Mukthar; K V Menon; G J Toogood; J P A Lodge; K R Prasad
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  Downstaging advanced hepatocellular carcinoma to the Milan criteria may provide a comparable outcome to conventional Milan criteria.

Authors:  Jianyong Lei; Wentao Wang; Lunan Yan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.