Literature DB >> 16564875

Peroral transgastric organ resection: a feasibility study in pigs.

Benjamin F Merrifield1, Mihir S Wagh, Christopher C Thompson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The feasibility of peroral transgastric peritoneoscopy, liver biopsy, and tubal ligation has been demonstrated in prior animal studies. This approach has the potential to reduce postoperative morbidity.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the technical challenges and complications of performing a transgastric organ resection.
DESIGN: Two-week animal survival study.
INTERVENTIONS: Five female Yorkshire pigs underwent peroral transgastric partial hysterectomy. With the animals under general anesthesia, a sterile esophageal overtube was placed and a gastric antibiotic lavage was performed. Subsequently, a needle-knife and through-the-scope dilating balloon were used to make an anterior gastric wall incision through which a therapeutic gastroscope was advanced into the peritoneal cavity. Endoscopes and instruments previously had been disinfected in a 2.4% glutaraldehyde bath or were disposable. An endoloop and polypectomy snare were used to resect a portion of the uterus, which was removed through the mouth. Gastric incision closure was attempted with endoclips. After 2 weeks of observation, necropsy was performed.
RESULTS: Transgastric partial hysterectomy was performed on all 5 animals. One animal became lethargic and febrile, so necropsy was performed on day 4. An incompletely closed gastric incision and suppurative peritonitis were found. A second animal developed a fever; necropsy performed on day 14 revealed a gastric abscess at the incision site and scattered abdominal pus. No complications were encountered in the 3 remaining animals, and necropsy revealed well-healed gastric incisions and no evidence of peritonitis.
CONCLUSION: Endoscopic transgastric partial hysterectomy is technically feasible in a porcine model. Strict sterility seems mandatory but cannot always be assured. Incomplete closure of the gastric incision may lead to significant complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16564875     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.11.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  55 in total

1.  Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: new minimally invasive surgery come of age.

Authors:  Chen Huang; Ren-Xiang Huang; Zheng-Jun Qiu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Pure natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) with ultrasonography-guided transgastric access and over-the-scope-clip closure: a porcine feasibility and survival study.

Authors:  Anders Meller Donatsky; Luise Andersen; Ole Lerberg Nielsen; Barbara Juliane Holzknecht; Peter Vilmann; Søren Meisner; Lars Nannestad Jørgensen; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Educational and training aspects of new surgical techniques: experience with the endoscopic–laparoscopic interdisciplinary training entity (ELITE) model in training for a natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) approach to appendectomy.

Authors:  Sonja Gillen; Jörn Gröne; Fritz Knödgen; Petra Wolf; Michael Meyer; Helmut Friess; Heinz-Johannes Buhr; Jörg-Peter Ritz; Hubertus Feussner; Kai S Lehmann
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Efficacy and safety of transgastric closure in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery using the OTSC system and T-bar sutures: a survival study in a porcine model.

Authors:  Abbas H Suhail; Ronald Mårvik; Jostein Halgunset; Esther Kuhry
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Intramural acellular porcine dermal matrix (APDM)-assisted gastrotomy closure for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).

Authors:  Jegan Gopal; Eric M Pauli; Randy S Haluck; Matthew T Moyer; Abraham Mathew
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Evaluation of the clinical and inflammatory responses in exclusively NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic routes: an experimental study in swine.

Authors:  Josiel P Vieira; Marcelo M Linhares; Elesiário M Caetano; Rita M A Moura; Vitor Asseituno; Rogério Fuzyi; Manoel J B Girão; José M Ruano; Alberto Goldenberg; Gaspar de Jesus L Filho; Délcio Matos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Durability of the self-approximating translumenal access technique (STAT) for potential use in natural orifice translumenal surgery (NOTES).

Authors:  Matthew T Moyer; Eric M Pauli; Jegan Gopal; Abraham Mathew; Randy S Haluck
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Dexterous miniature robot for advanced minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Amy C Lehman; Nathan A Wood; Shane Farritor; Matthew R Goede; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Transvesical peritoneoscopy with rigid scope: feasibility study in human male cadaver.

Authors:  Frederico Branco; Giovannalberto Pini; Luís Osório; Victor Cavadas; Rui Versos; Mário Gomes; Riccardo Autorino; J Correia-Pinto; Estevao Lima
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Natural orifice translumenal surgery: Flexible platform review.

Authors:  Sohail N Shaikh; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-06-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.