Literature DB >> 16563868

Adenomyosis: epidemiological factors.

Paolo Vercellini1, Paola Viganò, Edgar Somigliana, Raffaella Daguati, Annalisa Abbiati, Luigi Fedele.   

Abstract

Epidemiological studies of adenomyosis are difficult to interpret because the diagnostic criteria vary so widely that the disease may be easily over-diagnosed. This would severely hamper any attempt to define incidence and prevalence of the condition and the related risk factors, and would limit the possibility of clarifying to what extent adenomyosis contributes to clinical symptoms. There is a need for stringent and widely accepted diagnostic criteria in order to define not only the presence of adenomyosis but also depth of penetration and degree of spread of foci. Moreover, the evidence available on epidemiological characteristics of women with adenomyosis is greatly biased by the type of population studied, i.e. women undergoing hysterectomy. Therefore, a consensus on non-surgical diagnostic criteria at transvaginal ultrasonography and MRI is indispensable and urgently needed in order to be able to conduct epidemiological studies in women younger than those evaluated until now.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16563868     DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 1521-6934            Impact factor:   5.237


  59 in total

Review 1.  Pathophysiology of heavy menstrual bleeding.

Authors:  Dharani K Hapangama; Judith N Bulmer
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2015-12-23

Review 2.  A systematic review with meta-analysis: the common sonographic characteristics of adenomyosis.

Authors:  Katherine Dartmouth
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2014-03-25

3.  Effect of simvastatin on baboon endometriosis.

Authors:  Hugh S Taylor; Myles Alderman Iii; Thomas M D'Hooghe; Asgerally T Fazleabas; Antoni J Duleba
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.285

4.  A case-control investigation of adenomyosis: impact of control group selection on risk factor strength.

Authors:  Britton Trabert; Noel S Weiss; Carole B Rudra; Delia Scholes; Victoria L Holt
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2011-01-26

5.  Characteristics indicating adenomyosis coexisting with leiomyomas: a case-control study.

Authors:  F Andrei Taran; Amy L Weaver; Charles C Coddington; Elizabeth A Stewart
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Adenomyosis: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Clinical Phenotype and Surgical and Interventional Alternatives to Hysterectomy.

Authors:  F A Taran; E A Stewart; S Brucker
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.915

7.  The effect of adenomyosis on the outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Ali Yavuzcan; Alper Başbuğ; Merve Baştan; Mete Çağlar; İsmail Özdemir
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2016-09-01

8.  Risk for estrogen-dependent diseases in relation to phthalate exposure and polymorphisms of CYP17A1 and estrogen receptor genes.

Authors:  Po-Chin Huang; Wan-Fen Li; Pao-Chi Liao; Chien-Wen Sun; Eing-Mei Tsai; Shu-Li Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Adenomyosis and endometriosis in the California Teachers Study.

Authors:  Claire Templeman; Sarah F Marshall; Giske Ursin; Pamela L Horn-Ross; Christina A Clarke; Mark Allen; Dennis Deapen; Argyrios Ziogas; Peggy Reynolds; Rosemary Cress; Hoda Anton-Culver; Dee West; Ronald K Ross; Leslie Bernstein
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Understanding adenomyosis: a case control study.

Authors:  F Andrei Taran; Amy L Weaver; Charles C Coddington; Elizabeth A Stewart
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 7.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.