Literature DB >> 17919609

Adenomyosis and endometriosis in the California Teachers Study.

Claire Templeman1, Sarah F Marshall, Giske Ursin, Pamela L Horn-Ross, Christina A Clarke, Mark Allen, Dennis Deapen, Argyrios Ziogas, Peggy Reynolds, Rosemary Cress, Hoda Anton-Culver, Dee West, Ronald K Ross, Leslie Bernstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reproductive and lifestyle correlates of a surgically confirmed diagnosis of endometriosis or adenomyosis in a large prospective cohort.
DESIGN: Collection of surgical diagnoses of endometriosis and adenomyosis during follow-up of women with no prior history of endometriosis and no prior surgery for adenomyosis.
SETTING: The California Teachers Study (CTS), an ongoing prospective study of female teachers and school administrators established from the rolls of the California State Teachers Retirement System. PATIENT(S): Women with surgical diagnoses of endometriosis and adenomyosis were identified from California statewide hospital patient discharge records for CTS cohort members with an intact uterus and no prior history of endometriosis. Women with an incident surgical diagnosis of endometriosis (n = 229) or adenomyosis (n = 961) were compared with disease-free women in the same age range (for endometriosis, n = 43,493; for adenomyosis, n = 79,495). INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Multivariable logistic regression methods were used to calculate prevalence odds ratios and associated 95% confidence intervals for the associations between self-reported menstrual and reproductive characteristics and either endometriosis or adenomyosis. RESULT(S): Women surgically diagnosed with endometriosis were younger than those surgically diagnosed with adenomyosis. Factors statistically significantly associated with endometriosis were having a mother or sister with endometriosis and nulligravidity. Factors statistically significantly associated with adenomyosis were increasing parity, early menarche (<or=10 years of age), and short menstrual cycles (<or=24 days in length). Obese women also were more likely to have a surgical diagnosis of adenomyosis. CONCLUSION(S): These observations provide the first epidemiologic profile of women with a surgical diagnosis of adenomyosis and indicate that this profile differs from that of women with a surgical diagnosis of endometriosis. Our results also suggest that adenomyosis but not endometriosis is associated with increased endogenous exposure to estrogen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17919609      PMCID: PMC2813675          DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  19 in total

1.  Risk factors for adenomyosis.

Authors:  F Parazzini; P Vercellini; S Panazza; L Chatenoud; S Oldani; P G Crosignani
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  High breast cancer incidence rates among California teachers: results from the California Teachers Study (United States).

Authors:  Leslie Bernstein; Mark Allen; Hoda Anton-Culver; Dennis Deapen; Pamela L Horn-Ross; David Peel; Richard Pinder; Peggy Reynolds; Jane Sullivan-Halley; Dee West; William Wright; Al Ziogas; Ronald K Ross
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Clinical usefulness of determination of estradiol level in the menstrual blood for patients with endometriosis.

Authors:  K Takahashi; H Nagata; M Kitao
Journal:  Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  1989-11

4.  Adenomyosis at hysterectomy: prevalence and relationship to operative findings and reproductive and menstrual factors.

Authors:  D Vavilis; T Agorastos; J Tzafetas; A Loufopoulos; M Vakiani; T Constantinidis; K Patsiaoura; J Bontis
Journal:  Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 0.146

5.  The International Endogene Study: a collection of families for genetic research in endometriosis.

Authors:  Susan Treloar; Ruth Hadfield; Grant Montgomery; Ann Lambert; Jacki Wicks; David H Barlow; Daniel T O'Connor; Stephen Kennedy
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  The prevalence of endometriosis in women with chronic pelvic pain.

Authors:  Sun-Wei Guo; Yuedong Wang
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  Genetic factors contribute to the risk of developing endometriosis.

Authors:  H Stefansson; R T Geirsson; V Steinthorsdottir; H Jonsson; A Manolescu; A Kong; G Ingadottir; J Gulcher; K Stefansson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Epidemiology of endometriosis in women attending family planning clinics.

Authors:  M P Vessey; L Villard-Mackintosh; R Painter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-01-16

9.  Sonographic findings in patients with adenomyosis: can sonography assist in predicting extent of disease?

Authors:  Carol A Hulka; Deborah A Hall; Kathleen McCarthy; Joseph Simeone
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Incidence of laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis by demographic, anthropometric, and lifestyle factors.

Authors:  Stacey A Missmer; Susan E Hankinson; Donna Spiegelman; Robert L Barbieri; Lynn M Marshall; David J Hunter
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  28 in total

1.  TGF-β1 Neutralization Improves Pregnancy Outcomes by Restoring Endometrial Receptivity in Mice with Adenomyosis.

Authors:  Nari Kay; Chun-Yen Huang; Li-Yen Shiu; Ya-Chun Yu; Yu Chang; Frederick Schatz; Jau-Ling Suen; Eing-Mei Tsai; S Joseph Huang
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 3.060

2.  A case-control investigation of adenomyosis: impact of control group selection on risk factor strength.

Authors:  Britton Trabert; Noel S Weiss; Carole B Rudra; Delia Scholes; Victoria L Holt
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2011-01-26

3.  Characteristics indicating adenomyosis coexisting with leiomyomas: a case-control study.

Authors:  F Andrei Taran; Amy L Weaver; Charles C Coddington; Elizabeth A Stewart
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  The association of maternal factors with delayed implantation and the initial rise of urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin.

Authors:  A M Z Jukic; C R Weinberg; D D Baird; A J Wilcox
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Intermittent low back pain referred from a uterine adenomyosis: a case report.

Authors:  Anne M Jensen; Brutawit Bewketu; Douglas Sanford
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2011-03

6.  Adenomyosis: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Clinical Phenotype and Surgical and Interventional Alternatives to Hysterectomy.

Authors:  F A Taran; E A Stewart; S Brucker
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.915

7.  Birth weight, childhood body mass index and height and risks of endometriosis and adenomyosis.

Authors:  Julie Aarestrup; Britt W Jensen; Lian G Ulrich; Dorthe Hartwell; Britton Trabert; Jennifer L Baker
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 1.533

8.  Understanding adenomyosis: a case control study.

Authors:  F Andrei Taran; Amy L Weaver; Charles C Coddington; Elizabeth A Stewart
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Uterine junctional zone thickness, cervical length and bioelectrical impedance analysis of body composition in women with endometriosis.

Authors:  Selçuk Ayas; Mesut Bayraktar; Ayşe Gürbüz; Akif Alkan; Sadiye Eren
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.021

10.  Ensuring long-term sustainability of existing cohorts remains the highest priority to inform cancer prevention and control.

Authors:  Graham A Colditz
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-01-09       Impact factor: 2.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.