Literature DB >> 16562560

Preferred overall loudness. II: Listening through hearing aids in field and laboratory tests.

Karolina Smeds1, Gitte Keidser, Justin Zakis, Harvey Dillon, Arne Leijon, Frances Grant, Elizabeth Convery, Christopher Brew.   

Abstract

In a laboratory study, we found that normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners preferred less than normal overall calculated loudness (according to a loudness model of Moore & Glasberg, 1997). The current study verified those results using a research hearing aid. Fifteen hearing-impaired and eight normal-hearing participants used the hearing aid in the field and adjusted a volume control to give preferred loudness. The hearing aid logged the preferred volume control setting and the calculated loudness at that setting. The hearing-impaired participants preferred, in median, loudness levels of -14 phon re normal for input levels from 50 to 89 dB SPL. The normal-hearing participants preferred close to normal overall loudness. In subsequent laboratory tests, using the same hearing aid, both hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners preferred less than normal overall calculated loudness, and larger reductions for higher input levels In summary, the hearing-impaired listeners preferred less than normal overall calculated loudness, whereas the results for the normal-hearing listeners were inconclusive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16562560     DOI: 10.1080/14992020500190177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  6 in total

1.  Modern prescription theory and application: realistic expectations for speech recognition with hearing AIDS.

Authors:  Earl E Johnson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-11-18

2.  Self-Adjustment of Hearing Aid Amplification for Lower Speech Levels: Independent Ratings, Paired Comparisons, and Speech Recognition.

Authors:  Trevor T Perry; Peggy B Nelson
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 1.636

Review 3.  NAL-NL2 empirical adjustments.

Authors:  Gitte Keidser; Harvey Dillon; Lyndal Carter; Anna O'Brien
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-11-30

4.  Self-Adjusted Amplification Parameters Produce Large Between-Subject Variability and Preserve Speech Intelligibility.

Authors:  Peggy B Nelson; Trevor T Perry; Melanie Gregan; Dianne VanTasell
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  The NAL-NL2 Prescription Procedure.

Authors:  G Keidser; H Dillon; M Flax; T Ching; S Brewer
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2011-03-23

6.  The Virtual Reality Lab: Realization and Application of Virtual Sound Environments.

Authors:  Volker Hohmann; Richard Paluch; Melanie Krueger; Markus Meis; Giso Grimm
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.562

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.