Literature DB >> 16557132

Removal of flexible titanium nails in children.

Naum Simanovsky1, Mohammad Abu Tair, Natalia Simanovsky, Shlomo Porat.   

Abstract

Removal of hardware in children after orthopaedic procedures is controversial. The authors retrospectively reviewed hospital charts and radiographs of 143 children who underwent removal of flexible titanium nails from the femur and the forearm. In 16 children the nails were removed because of protrusion, skin irritation, and some discomfort. Most of the patients were asymptomatic and underwent nail removal electively, according to the authors' policy for routine hardware removal in children. Complications included unsuccessful nail removal in three children and refractures after nail removal in two. Although the authors are still inclined to remove flexible titanium nails in most of the patients, the need for routine elective execution of this procedure may be questionable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16557132     DOI: 10.1097/01.bpo.0000218534.51609.aa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  12 in total

1.  Implant removal in children.

Authors:  P P Schmittenbecher
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Inpatient orthopaedic hardware removal in children: A cross-Sectional study.

Authors:  Alexandre Boulos; Steven F DeFroda; Justin E Kleiner; Nathan Thomas; Joseph A Gil; Aristides I Cruz
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-07-01

3.  A Novel Technique for the Removal of Elastic Intramedullary Nail in Pediatric Long Bones: A Technical Note.

Authors:  Vinay K Gautam; Ashish S Ranade; Mahesh Mone; Gauri A Oka
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-08-13

4.  Cellular reactions to biodegradable magnesium alloys on human growth plate chondrocytes and osteoblasts.

Authors:  Karin Pichler; Tanja Kraus; Elisabeth Martinelli; Patrick Sadoghi; Giuseppe Musumeci; Peter J Uggowitzer; Annelie M Weinberg
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Closed reduction of radius refracture: A case report.

Authors:  Mohammad Shahid; Mildrid Yeo; John Graham Smibert
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2011-09-07

6.  Refractures of the paediatric forearm with the intramedullary nail in situ.

Authors:  Pim W van Egmond; Hans A van der Sluijs; Barend J van Royen; Rachid Saouti
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-09-24

7.  Implant removal associated complications in children with limb fractures due to trauma.

Authors:  E A Gorter; D I Vos; C F M Sier; I B Schipper
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.693

8.  Pediatric forearm fractures with in situ intramedullary implants.

Authors:  Brian A Kelly; Benjamin J Shore; Donald S Bae; Daniel J Hedequist; Michael P Glotzbecker
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 1.548

9.  [Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) in the treatment of both-bone forearm fractures in the child: about 87 cases].

Authors:  Saad Andaloussi; Mohamed Amine Oukhouya; Othmane Alaoui; Karima Atarraf; Lamiae Chater; My Abderrahmane Afifi
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2017-05-30

10.  Surgeons' beliefs and perceptions about removal of orthopaedic implants.

Authors:  Beate Hanson; Chris van der Werken; Dirk Stengel
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-05-24       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.