Literature DB >> 16555125

Predictors of local recurrence after conservative surgery and whole-breast irradiation.

Giampiero Ausili Cèfaro1, Domenico Genovesi, Rita Marchese, Lucia Anna Ursini, Ettore Cianchetti, Enzo Ballone, Marta Di Nicola.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify independent factors associated with increased risk of local recurrence (LR) in patients with breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiotherapy with or without systemic therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between January 1997 and December 2001, 969 women were treated at the Radiation Oncology Department in Chieti. We retrospectively analyzed 802 of them who were treated with conservative surgery and whole breast irradiation with or without systemic therapy. Tangential fields delivering 50 Gy to the whole breast were used and a boost was added for a total dose of 60 Gy. chi(2)-test or Fisher's exact test were used to identify independent significant factors that are predictive for LR. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the 8-year rates of recurrence according to age, histologic findings, tumor size, number of positive nodes, margin status, receptor status and systemic therapy use: log-rank test was used to compare these curves. Cox proportional hazard model was used to obtain hazard ratios and 95% CI of LR for each covariate.
RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 63.1 months. LR occurred in 33 (4.1%) of 802 patients. Percentage of LR was greater in <50 year-olds compared with 50-64 year-olds and > or =65 year-olds (9.8% versus 4.1 and 2.0%, respectively). LR was 18.8% in women with a tumor size >3 cm versus 3.5, 4.0, 5.5% in women with a tumor size of 0.1-1, 1.1-2, 2.1-3 cm, respectively. The 8-year LR rate calculated with Kaplan-Meier method was 6.54+/-1.51. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that independent significant factors that are predictive for LR were: age <50, tumor size >3 cm, positive margin or unknown status, and hormonal therapy alone versus chemotherapy or combined therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Age and tumor size were the most important and statistically significant factors that correlated independently with higher rates of LR. Women <50 years old and with a tumor size >3 cm had a higher risk of LR. Also margin status and systemic therapy could influence LR risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16555125     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-006-9169-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  12 in total

1.  Histopathological features of invasion of breast invasive ductal carcinoma and safety of breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Chunping Liu; Huaxiong Pan; Zhi Li; Lan Shi; Tao Huang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2009-02-18

2.  Assessing breast tumor margin by multispectral photoacoustic tomography.

Authors:  Rui Li; Pu Wang; Lu Lan; Frank P Lloyd; Craig J Goergen; Shaoxiong Chen; Ji-Xin Cheng
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 3.  Diagnosing clean margins through Raman spectroscopy in human and animal mammary tumour surgery: a short review.

Authors:  I A Birtoiu; C Rizea; D Togoe; R M Munteanu; C Micsa; M I Rusu; M Tautan; L Braic; L O Scoicaru; A Parau; N D Becherescu-Barbu; M V Udrea; A Tonetto; R Notonier; C E A Grigorescu
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Mastectomy versus breast-conservation therapy: an examination of how individual, clinicopathologic, and physician factors influence decision-making.

Authors:  J Gu; M Delisle; R Engler-Stringer; G Groot
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Multiscale nonlinear microscopy and widefield white light imaging enables rapid histological imaging of surgical specimen margins.

Authors:  Michael G Giacomelli; Tadayuki Yoshitake; Lucas C Cahill; Hilde Vardeh; Liza M Quintana; Beverly E Faulkner-Jones; Jeff Brooker; James L Connolly; James G Fujimoto
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Safe negative margin width in breast conservative therapy: results from a population with a high percentage of negative prognostic factors.

Authors:  Abu Bakar Bhatti; Amina Khan; Narjis Muzaffar; Neelam Siddiqui; Aamir Syed; Mazhar Shah; Awais Aamir; Arif Jamshed
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Intraoperative evaluation of breast tumor margins with optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Freddy T Nguyen; Adam M Zysk; Eric J Chaney; Jan G Kotynek; Uretz J Oliphant; Frank J Bellafiore; Kendrith M Rowland; Patricia A Johnson; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  Obtaining adequate surgical margins in breast-conserving therapy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: current modalities and future directions.

Authors:  Rick G Pleijhuis; Maurits Graafland; Jakob de Vries; Joost Bart; Johannes S de Jong; Gooitzen M van Dam
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 9.  Accelerated partial breast irradiation with brachytherapy: patient selection and technique considerations.

Authors:  Daniel M Trifiletti; Kara D Romano; Shayna L Showalter; Kelli A Reardon; Bruce Libby; Timothy N Showalter
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2015-07-29

10.  Virtual Hematoxylin and Eosin Transillumination Microscopy Using Epi-Fluorescence Imaging.

Authors:  Michael G Giacomelli; Lennart Husvogt; Hilde Vardeh; Beverly E Faulkner-Jones; Joachim Hornegger; James L Connolly; James G Fujimoto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.