S K Kamboj1, H V Curran. 1. Clinical Psychopharmacology Unit, Sub-Department of Clinical Health Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK. sunjeev.kamboj@ucl.ac.uk
Abstract
RATIONALE: Recent psychopharmacological studies lend support to the notion of partially dissociable neuronal systems dedicated to processing specific emotions. For example, GABA-ergic enhancement after an acute dose of the benzodiazepine, diazepam, produces specific impairments in anger and fear recognition. However, it is unclear if these impairments are a general property of benzodiazepines and other drugs that produce a similar profile of neurocognitive impairment to benzodiazepines, such as the anticholinergic, scopolamine. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effects of scopolamine and the benzodiazepine, lorazepam, on emotion-recognition accuracy. METHODS: A double-blind independent group design was used with 48 healthy volunteers to compare the effects of scopolamine and lorazepam with an inactive placebo on a commonly used emotion-recognition task. Control measures included an episodic memory task and subjective mood ratings. RESULTS:Anger and disgust recognition accuracy was impaired after scopolamine. In contrast, lorazepam produced no impairment in emotion-recognition despite producing similar levels of sedation and anterograde amnesia to scopolamine. CONCLUSIONS:Scopolamine-induced cholinergic hypofunction selectively impaired the recognition accuracy of disgust and anger facial expressions. The effects of scopolamine on emotion-recognition are similar to those found in Huntington's disease patients. Furthermore, the impairments in anger and fear recognition previously observed with diazepam do not appear to be a general property of benzodiazepines. This suggests that alterations in emotional processing involving changes in the ability to recognize threat-related emotions (particularly, fear and anger) may not be a principal mechanism underlying anxiolysis or paradoxical aggression seen with benzodiazepines.
RCT Entities:
RATIONALE: Recent psychopharmacological studies lend support to the notion of partially dissociable neuronal systems dedicated to processing specific emotions. For example, GABA-ergic enhancement after an acute dose of the benzodiazepine, diazepam, produces specific impairments in anger and fear recognition. However, it is unclear if these impairments are a general property of benzodiazepines and other drugs that produce a similar profile of neurocognitive impairment to benzodiazepines, such as the anticholinergic, scopolamine. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effects of scopolamine and the benzodiazepine, lorazepam, on emotion-recognition accuracy. METHODS: A double-blind independent group design was used with 48 healthy volunteers to compare the effects of scopolamine and lorazepam with an inactive placebo on a commonly used emotion-recognition task. Control measures included an episodic memory task and subjective mood ratings. RESULTS: Anger and disgust recognition accuracy was impaired after scopolamine. In contrast, lorazepam produced no impairment in emotion-recognition despite producing similar levels of sedation and anterograde amnesia to scopolamine. CONCLUSIONS:Scopolamine-induced cholinergic hypofunction selectively impaired the recognition accuracy of disgust and anger facial expressions. The effects of scopolamine on emotion-recognition are similar to those found in Huntington's diseasepatients. Furthermore, the impairments in anger and fear recognition previously observed with diazepam do not appear to be a general property of benzodiazepines. This suggests that alterations in emotional processing involving changes in the ability to recognize threat-related emotions (particularly, fear and anger) may not be a principal mechanism underlying anxiolysis or paradoxical aggression seen with benzodiazepines.
Authors: Catherine J Harmer; Simon A Hill; Matthew J Taylor; Philip J Cowen; Guy M Goodwin Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Julie A Dumas; Brenna C McDonald; Andrew J Saykin; Thomas W McAllister; Mary L Hynes; John D West; Paul A Newhouse Journal: Menopause Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Anne Catrien Baakman; Ricardo Alvarez-Jimenez; Robert Rissmann; Erica S Klaassen; Jasper Stevens; Sebastiaan C Goulooze; Jeroen C G den Burger; Eleonora L Swart; Joop M A van Gerven; Geert Jan Groeneveld Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2017-04-08 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Helena Garcez; Carina Fernandes; Fernando Barbosa; Mariana R Pereira; Celeste Silveira; João Marques-Teixeira; Ana R Gonçalves Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2019-11-18 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Maura L Furey; Wayne C Drevets; Elana M Hoffman; Erica Frankel; Andrew M Speer; Carlos A Zarate Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Sunjeev K Kamboj; Alyssa Joye; James A Bisby; Ravi K Das; Bradley Platt; H Valerie Curran Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2012-12-22 Impact factor: 4.530