Literature DB >> 16555018

Lean mass plays a gender-specific role in familial resemblance for femoral neck bone mineral density in adult subjects.

H Blain1, A Vuillemin, C Jeandel, P Jouanny, F Guillemin, E Le Bihan.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Whether the femoral neck bone mineral density (FN BMD) of children may be better predicted from that of their parents when taking into account the anthropometry of the children was assessed in a healthy adult sample consisting of 86 mother-daughter, 32 mother-son, 32 father-daughter, and 23 father-son pairs from 128 families. Heritability for FN BMD, which is considered to be a measurement of general resemblance, was defined as the regression coefficient of the mean of the parents' BMD. Among the anthropometric factors, lean mass was the most strongly associated with FN BMD following the adjustment for age in women (r=0.52, p<0.0001) and men (r=0.25, p=0.02). After adjustment for age, calcium intake, physical activity, and menopause and hormonal replacement therapy if relevant, heritability estimates (h2) for FN BMD were 0.68+/-0.23 [95% credible interval (CI): 0.15-0.99] in father-daughter pairs, 0.40+/-0.17 (95% CI: 0.08-0.74) in mother-daughter pairs, and 0.19+/-0.15 (95% CI: 0.01-0.57) in father-son pairs. Adjustment for lean mass of children increased the h2 for FN BMD in mother-son pairs [from 0.24+/-0.17 (95% CI: 0.01-0.57) to 0.66+/-0.18 (95% CI: 0.26-0.95)]. The present results show that FN BMD is heritable in adult father-daughter pairs (7.2% of a daughter's FN BMD variance was explained by the father's FN BMD) and that taking into account the lean mass of sons might improve the prediction of their FN BMD based on that of their mother's (reduction of sons' FN BMD residual variance by 5.1%). Taking the lean mass of children into account might improve the prediction of their FN BMD by 9.1% in daughters and by 18.1% in sons, irrespective of their parent's FN BMD. These results, obtained using a Bayesian regression model, have to be confirmed in further studies involving a greater number of adult parent-offspring pairs of both genders before extrapolation to clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16555018     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-005-0062-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  29 in total

1.  Genetic determinants of bone mass in adult women: a reevaluation of the twin model and the potential importance of gene interaction on heritability estimates.

Authors:  C W Slemenda; J C Christian; C J Williams; J A Norton; C C Johnston
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Familial resemblance for bone mineral mass is expressed before puberty.

Authors:  S Ferrari; R Rizzoli; D Slosman; J P Bonjour
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Genetic and environmental influences on level of habitual physical activity and exercise participation.

Authors:  L Pérusse; A Tremblay; C Leblanc; C Bouchard
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Heritable and life-style determinants of bone mineral density.

Authors:  E A Krall; B Dawson-Hughes
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Bone density determinants in elderly women: a twin study.

Authors:  L Flicker; J L Hopper; L Rodgers; B Kaymakci; R M Green; J D Wark
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Heritability: one word, three concepts.

Authors:  A Jacquard
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Bone mass in middle-aged osteoporotic men and their relatives: familial effect.

Authors:  M E Cohen-Solal; C Baudoin; M Omouri; D Kuntz; M C De Vernejoul
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Age, gender, and body mass effects on quantitative trait loci for bone mineral density: the Framingham Study.

Authors:  D Karasik; L A Cupples; M T Hannan; D P Kiel
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Environmental and genetic factors affecting bone mass. Similarity of bone density among members of healthy families.

Authors:  P Jouanny; F Guillemin; C Kuntz; C Jeandel; J Pourel
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1995-01

10.  Family history of osteoporosis and bone mineral density at the axial skeleton: the Rancho Bernardo Study.

Authors:  S B Soroko; E Barrett-Connor; S L Edelstein; D Kritz-Silverstein
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Evidence for pleiotropic factors in genetics of the musculoskeletal system.

Authors:  David Karasik; Douglas P Kiel
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Familial resemblance of bone turnover rate in men aged 40 and over-the MINOS study.

Authors:  Hoda Nagy; Clément Feyt; Roland Chapurlat; Pawel Szulc
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 2.626

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.