Literature DB >> 16553065

Usability of touch-panel interfaces for older adults.

Atsuo Murata1, Hirokazu Iwase.   

Abstract

The usability of a touch-panel interface was compared among young, middle-aged, and older adults. In addition, a performance model of a touch panel was developed so that pointing time could be predicted with higher accuracy. Moreover, the target location to which a participant could point most quickly was determined. The pointing time with a PC mouse was longer for the older adults than for the other age groups, whereas there were no significant differences in pointing time among the three age groups when a touch-panel interface was used. Pointing to the center of a square target led to the fastest pointing time among nine target locations. Based on these results, we offer some guidelines for the design of touch-panel interfaces and show implications for users of different age groups. Actual or potential applications of this research include designing touch-panel interfaces to make them accessible for older adults and predicting movement times when users operate such devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16553065     DOI: 10.1518/001872005775570952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  12 in total

1.  Touch screen performance by individuals with and without motor control disabilities.

Authors:  Karen B Chen; Anne B Savage; Amrish O Chourasia; Douglas A Wiegmann; Mary E Sesto
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 3.661

2.  Empowering older patients to engage in self care: designing an interactive robotic device.

Authors:  Priyadarshi Tiwari; Jim Warren; Karen Day
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

3.  Evaluating patient-centered care: feasibility of electronic data collection in hospitalized older adults.

Authors:  Joanne R Duffy; Wendy Carter Kooken; Cheryl L Wolverton; Michael T Weaver
Journal:  J Nurs Care Qual       Date:  2012 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.597

4.  Using Direct and Indirect Input Devices: Attention Demands and Age-Related Differences.

Authors:  Anne Collins McLaughlin; Wendy A Rogers; Arthur D Fisk
Journal:  ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.351

5.  Perceptions of a Specific Family Communication Application among Grandparents and Grandchildren: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model.

Authors:  Tsai-Hsuan Tsai; Hsien-Tsung Chang; Yi-Lun Ho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Evaluation of a Blended Physical Activity Intervention for Older Adults: Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Sumit Mehra; Jantine van den Helder; Bart Visser; Raoul H H Engelbert; Peter J M Weijs; Ben J A Kröse
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Evaluating Digital Maturity and Patient Acceptability of Real-Time Patient Experience Feedback Systems: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mustafa Khanbhai; Kelsey Flott; Ara Darzi; Erik Mayer
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 8.  Smart home for elderly care: development and challenges in China.

Authors:  Quan Zhang; Meiyu Li; Yijin Wu
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 3.921

9.  Translating Behavior Change Principles Into a Blended Exercise Intervention for Older Adults: Design Study.

Authors:  Sumit Mehra; Bart Visser; Tessa Dadema; Jantine van den Helder; Raoul Hh Engelbert; Peter Jm Weijs; Ben Ja Kröse
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2018-05-02

10.  Supporting Older Adults in Exercising With a Tablet: A Usability Study.

Authors:  Sumit Mehra; Bart Visser; Nazli Cila; Jantine van den Helder; Raoul Hh Engelbert; Peter Jm Weijs; Ben Ja Kröse
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2019-02-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.