Literature DB >> 16552456

The smile buccal corridors: aesthetic value for dentists and laypersons.

Antonio Gracco1, Mauro Cozzani, Luca D'Elia, Manuela Manfrini, Cristiano Peverada, Giuseppe Siciliani.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to assess the aesthetic value of "buccal corridors" on smile attractiveness as judged by dentists and laypersons. In order to evaluate the aesthetic impact of the "buccal corridors", a pleasant smile (frontal view) was scanned (Scanner HP 5490C, 1200 x 1200 dpi) and modified (Adobe Photoshop 5.0) by a professional computer technician. Three pictures have been produced, one with minimal corridors (no 1), another with evident corridors (no 2), and a third one with moderate corridors (no 3). During a survey 1275 laypersons (413 M, 862 F; 14 to 77 years) and 646 dentists (361 M, 285 F; from 25 to 80 years) were asked to indicate the most pleasant and the most unpleasant smile and to fill in a short questionnaire; the data have been statistically evaluated through an ANOVA test. Among the laypersons: 838 (65.72%) chose the first smile; 91 (7.13%) the second one; whereas 346 (27.13%) the third one. The differences are statistically significant (p .05); no statistical differences were found by analyzing the gender and the age of the groups. Among the dentists: 481 (74.46%) preferred the first smile; 44 (6.81%) the second one; whereas 121 (18.73%) the third one, the differences are statistically significant (p .05), no statistical differences were found by analyzing the gender and the age of the groups. Moreover no statistical differences were found by comparing the two different groups. Therefore, a full, broad smile with minimal "buccal corridors" seems to please dentists as well as laypersons and age and gender were not relevant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16552456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Orthod        ISSN: 1723-7785            Impact factor:   2.750


  10 in total

1.  Influence of Smile Arc and Buccal Corridors on Facial Attractiveness: A Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Shashank Gaikwad; Harsimran Kaur; Anna C Vaz; Baldeep Singh; Lavina Taneja; K S Vinod; Prateek Verma
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-09-01

2.  Patients' self-perception of dentofacial attractiveness before and after exposure to facial photographs.

Authors:  Giulio Alessandri Bonetti; Andrea Alberti; Claudio Sartini; Serena Incerti Parenti
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Esthetics and smile characteristics evaluated by laypersons.

Authors:  Catherine McLeod; H W Fields; Frank Hechter; William Wiltshire; Wellington Rody; James Christensen
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 4.  Influence of orthodontic treatment, midline position, buccal corridor and smile arc on smile attractiveness.

Authors:  Guilherme Janson; Nuria Castello Branco; Thais Maria Freire Fernandes; Renata Sathler; Daniela Garib; José Roberto Pereira Lauris
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Smile microesthetics as perceived by dental professionals and laypersons.

Authors:  Sawsan A Alomari; Elham S Abu Alhaija; Ahed M AlWahadni; Akram K Al-Tawachi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Morphological features of smile attractiveness and related factors influence perception and gingival aesthetic parameters.

Authors:  Thuy Anh Vu Pham; Phuc Anh Nguyen
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 2.607

7.  Buccal Corridors: A Fact or a Myth in the Eyes of Laymen?

Authors:  Omnia A Elhiny; Asmaa Y Harhash
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2016-11-01

8.  Perception of smile esthetics by laypeople of different ages.

Authors:  Chompunuch Sriphadungporn; Niramol Chamnannidiadha
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 2.750

9.  Effects of tooth extraction on smile esthetics and the buccal corridor: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hsin-Chung Cheng; Yi-Chun Wang; Ka-Wai Tam; Ming-Fang Yen
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 2.080

10.  Psychometric properties of the Albanian version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale: OES-ALB.

Authors:  Venera Bimbashi; Asja Čelebić; Gloria Staka; Flurije Hoxha; Sanja Peršić; Nikola Petričević
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.757

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.