Literature DB >> 16552224

The drive for operating room efficiency will increase quality of patient care.

Tom Archer1, Alex Macario.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The public is demanding that medicine both increase its efficiency and lower its costs. 'Watchdog' groups are scrutinizing our performance, publicizing our results, and forcing us to compete. They want doctors first to use evidence-based medicine to identify truly beneficial healthcare interventions and then to use continuous quality improvement to perform those beneficial interventions consistently at lower costs. RECENT
FINDINGS: A renaissance is underway in our thinking about quality and efficiency in the operating room. 'Work process redesign' and 'the systems approach' are starting to be more than slogans, as researchers redesign the physical environment of the operating room, along with its 'workflow' and methods of communication.
SUMMARY: Soon physicians and hospitals will be receiving 'pay-for-performance', whereby our income will depend on our ability to demonstrate both good patient care processes and good outcomes. Medicine is starting to act like a competitive industry, and this tendency will be good for quality and efficiency in the operating room. Community and academic practitioners need to understand and participate in this transformation in order to be able to influence its evolution and to survive financially.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16552224     DOI: 10.1097/01.aco.0000192796.02797.82

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol        ISSN: 0952-7907            Impact factor:   2.706


  20 in total

1.  [Workflow management in the operating room. Analysis of potentials for optimizing efficiency at a university hospital].

Authors:  A Welker; B Wolcke; A Schleppers; S B Schmeck; U Focke; H W Gervais; J Schmeck
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Improving on-time surgical starts in an operating room.

Authors:  James G Wright; Ann Roche; Antoine E Khoury
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  [Standard operating procedures and operating room management: Improvement of patient safety and the efficiency of processes].

Authors:  Jörg U Bleyl; Axel R Heller
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2008

Review 4.  Surgical process modelling: a review.

Authors:  Florent Lalys; Pierre Jannin
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Analysis of surgical intervention populations using generic surgical process models.

Authors:  Thomas Neumuth; Pierre Jannin; Juliane Schlomberg; Jürgen Meixensberger; Peter Wiedemann; Oliver Burgert
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-06-06       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Vision-based online recognition of surgical activities.

Authors:  Michael Unger; Claire Chalopin; Thomas Neumuth
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Intra-operative surgical instrument usage detection on a multi-sensor table.

Authors:  Bernhard Glaser; Stefan Dänzer; Thomas Neumuth
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Design and evaluation of an interactive training system for scrub nurses.

Authors:  Bernhard Glaser; Tobias Schellenberg; Lucas Koch; Mathias Hofer; Susanne Modemann; Patrick Dubach; Thomas Neumuth
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  Knee arthroscopy routines and practice.

Authors:  M Brattwall; E Jacobson; M Forssblad; J Jakobsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  [Anaesthetists learn--do institutions also learn? Importance of institutional learning and corporate culture in clinics].

Authors:  G Schüpfer; R Gfrörer; A Schleppers
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.041

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.