BACKGROUND: Monitoring renal function is crucial in children undergoing chemotherapy. To date, a combination of routine serum creatinine (SCR) monitoring with occasional determination of creatinine clearance ratio (CCR) is widely used as clinical standard for this purpose. Both methods have their limitations regarding diagnostic value (SCR) or practicability (CCR), especially in young children. Diagnostic alternatives, such as glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation formulas have not been proved to be superior. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether serum cystatin C (CysC) may have a diagnostic impact on pediatric patients. PROCEDURE: CysC, SCR, several GFR estimation formulas (Counahan-Barratt, Ghazali-Barratt, Schwartz, Shull, Traub), and CCR were studied in 80 pediatric cancer patients (age range: 0.17-17.9 years) during their chemotherapy. Special attention was given to children under the age of 3 in whom accurate urine collection for CCR is difficult. RESULTS: All parameters correlated similarly well with CCR. Total accuracy was 66% and 67% for CysC and SCR, respectively. In very young children (<3 years), correlation with CCR was for CysC r = -0.74 with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.646, and for SCR r = -0.27 with AUC = 0.594. Total accuracy was 60% for CysC, 50% for SCR. CONCLUSIONS: CysC represents a suitable marker for monitoring renal function in pediatric cancer patients. In young children (<3 years), CysC may have a better diagnostic value than SCR. Future studies should show if CysC can improve renal monitoring by replacing SCR, especially in very young children. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND: Monitoring renal function is crucial in children undergoing chemotherapy. To date, a combination of routine serum creatinine (SCR) monitoring with occasional determination of creatinine clearance ratio (CCR) is widely used as clinical standard for this purpose. Both methods have their limitations regarding diagnostic value (SCR) or practicability (CCR), especially in young children. Diagnostic alternatives, such as glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation formulas have not been proved to be superior. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether serum cystatin C (CysC) may have a diagnostic impact on pediatric patients. PROCEDURE: CysC, SCR, several GFR estimation formulas (Counahan-Barratt, Ghazali-Barratt, Schwartz, Shull, Traub), and CCR were studied in 80 pediatric cancerpatients (age range: 0.17-17.9 years) during their chemotherapy. Special attention was given to children under the age of 3 in whom accurate urine collection for CCR is difficult. RESULTS: All parameters correlated similarly well with CCR. Total accuracy was 66% and 67% for CysC and SCR, respectively. In very young children (<3 years), correlation with CCR was for CysC r = -0.74 with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.646, and for SCR r = -0.27 with AUC = 0.594. Total accuracy was 60% for CysC, 50% for SCR. CONCLUSIONS:CysC represents a suitable marker for monitoring renal function in pediatric cancerpatients. In young children (<3 years), CysC may have a better diagnostic value than SCR. Future studies should show if CysC can improve renal monitoring by replacing SCR, especially in very young children. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Penny Whiting; Kate Birnie; Jonathan A C Sterne; Catherine Jameson; Rod Skinner; Bob Phillips Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-12-06 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Marie A Neu; Alexandra Russo; Arthur Wingerter; Francesca Alt; Johanna Theruvath; Khalifa El Malki; Bettina Kron; Matthias Dittrich; Johannes Lotz; Raimund Stein; Rolf Beetz; Joerg Faber Journal: Pediatr Nephrol Date: 2017-04-28 Impact factor: 3.714
Authors: Marika H Grönroos; Timo Jahnukainen; Kerttu Irjala; Risto Härkönen; Saija Hurme; Merja Möttönen; Toivo T Salmi Journal: Pediatr Nephrol Date: 2008-01-23 Impact factor: 3.714