Literature DB >> 16549834

Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of catheter-related thrombosis in adult patients with cancer.

Agnes Y Y Lee1, Mark N Levine, Gregory Butler, Carolyn Webb, Lorrie Costantini, Chushu Gu, Jim A Julian.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Thrombosis of long-term central venous catheters (CVC) is a serious complication that causes morbidity and interrupts the infusion of chemotherapy, intravenous medication, and blood products. We performed a prospective study to examine the incidence, risk factors, and long-term complications of symptomatic catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) in adults with cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with cancer, undergoing insertion of a CVC, were enrolled and prospectively followed while their catheter remained in place plus 4 subsequent weeks or a maximum of 52 weeks, whichever came first. Patients with symptomatic CRT were followed for an additional 52 weeks from the date of CRT diagnosis. The end points were symptomatic CRT, symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE), postphlebitic syndrome, and catheter life span.
RESULTS: Over 76,713 patient-days of follow-up, 19 of 444 patients (4.3%) had symptomatic CRT in 19 of 500 catheters (0.3 per 1,000 catheter-days). The median time to CRT was 30 days and the median catheter life span was 88 days. Significant baseline risk factors for CRT were: more than one insertion attempt (odds ratio [OR] = 5.5; 95% CI, 1.2 to 24.6; P = .03); ovarian cancer (OR = 4.8; 95% CI, 1.5 to 15.1; P = .01); and previous CVC insertion (OR = 3.8; 95% CI, 1.4 to 10.4; P = .01). Nine of the 19 CRT patients were treated with anticoagulants alone, eight patients were treated with anticoagulants and catheter removal, while two patients did not receive anticoagulation. None had recurrent CRT or symptomatic PE. Postphlebitic symptoms were infrequent.
CONCLUSION: In adults with cancer, the incidence of symptomatic CRT is low and long-term complications are uncommon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16549834     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.5600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  62 in total

1.  Port catheter versus peripherally inserted central catheter for postoperative chemotherapy in early breast cancer: a retrospective analysis of 448 patients.

Authors:  L Lefebvre; E Noyon; D Georgescu; V Proust; C Alexandru; M Leheurteur; J C Thery; L Savary; O Rigal; F Di Fiore; C Veyret; F Clatot
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Prevention of VTE in nonsurgical patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Susan R Kahn; Wendy Lim; Andrew S Dunn; Mary Cushman; Francesco Dentali; Elie A Akl; Deborah J Cook; Alex A Balekian; Russell C Klein; Hoang Le; Sam Schulman; M Hassan Murad
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Central venous catheter-related thrombosis in cancer patients: what we know and what we need to know.

Authors:  Davide Tassinari; Carlotta Santelmo; Paola Tombesi; Sergio Sartori
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Primary venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with solid tumors: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Minh Phan; Sonia John; Ana I Casanegra; Suman Rathbun; Aaron Mansfield; Julie A Stoner; Alfonso J Tafur
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Risk factors for catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) in cancer patients: a patient-level data (IPD) meta-analysis of clinical trials and prospective studies.

Authors:  W Saber; T Moua; E C Williams; M Verso; G Agnelli; S Couban; A Young; M De Cicco; R Biffi; C J van Rooden; M V Huisman; D Fagnani; C Cimminiello; M Moia; M Magagnoli; S P Povoski; S F Malak; A Y Lee
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.824

6.  SEOM clinical guideline of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and cancer (2019).

Authors:  A J Muñoz Martín; E Gallardo Díaz; I García Escobar; R Macías Montero; V Martínez-Marín; V Pachón Olmos; P Pérez Segura; T Quintanar Verdúguez; M Salgado Fernández
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  Should cancer patients receive thromboprophylaxis to prevent catheter-related upper limb deep vein thrombosis?

Authors:  Paolo Prandoni
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.397

8.  Venous thromboembolic disease.

Authors:  Michael B Streiff; Paula L Bockenstedt; Spero R Cataland; Carolyn Chesney; Charles Eby; John Fanikos; Patrick F Fogarty; Shuwei Gao; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Hani Hassoun; Paul Hendrie; Bjorn Holmstrom; Kimberly A Jones; Nicole Kuderer; Jason T Lee; Michael M Millenson; Anne T Neff; Thomas L Ortel; Judy L Smith; Gary C Yee; Anaadriana Zakarija
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 11.908

9.  Secondary Anticoagulation Prophylaxis for Catheter-Related Thrombosis in Pediatric Intestinal Failure: Comparison of Short- Vs Long-Term Treatment Protocols.

Authors:  Melanie Lissa Schmidt; Danielle Wendel; Simon Peter Horslen; Erin Richardson Lane; Leonardo Rodrigues Brandão; Emily Gottschalk; Christina Belza; Glenda Courtney-Martin; Paul William Wales; Yaron Avitzur
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2020-12-06       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Central venous port system associated thromboses: outcome in 3498 implantations and literature review.

Authors:  Martina Schumacher; Roland H Wagner
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2007-09-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.