Literature DB >> 1654983

A randomised trial of planned versus as required chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer: a Cancer Research Campaign trial.

H M Earl1, R M Rudd, S G Spiro, C M Ash, L E James, C S Law, J S Tobias, P G Harper, D M Geddes, D Eraut.   

Abstract

In a study of chemotherapy as palliative treatment, 300 patients with untreated limited and extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC), who did not have progressive disease after the first cycle of chemotherapy, were randomised to receive either regular 'planned' chemotherapy or chemotherapy given 'as required' (AR). All patients received the same chemotherapy: cyclophosphamide 1 gm m-2 i.v., vincristine 2 mg i.v., and etoposide 120 mg m-2 i.v. on day 1, and etoposide 100 mg b.d. orally on days 2 and 3. Planned chemotherapy was given regularly every 3 weeks. AR chemotherapy was given for tumour-related symptoms, or for radiological progression of disease. Both groups of patients were assessed every 3 weeks and a maximum of eight cycles of chemotherapy was given. A detailed quality of life assessment was made using daily diary cards. The median survival (MS) of patients given AR chemotherapy was not significantly worse than those receiving planned treatment [MS: Planned = 36 weeks (95% C.I. 32-40 weeks), AR = 32 weeks (95% C.I. 28-37 weeks) P = 0.960]. In the AR patients the median interval between treatments was 42 days. On average AR patients received half as much chemotherapy as planned patients. AR patients with a treatment-free interval (TFI) of more than 8 weeks between the first and second cycles of chemotherapy survived longer than those in whom this interval was less than 4 weeks; [MS: TFI greater than 8 = 47 weeks (95% C.I. 32-53 weeks); TFI less than 4 = 24 weeks (95% C.I. 17-34 weeks) P = 0.013]. Contrary to expectation, in the quality of life assessment the AR patients scored themselves as having more severe symptoms than patients receiving planned treatment. AR chemotherapy is a novel method of attempting to use cytotoxic drugs palliatively, which resulted in less drug treatment for approximately equivalent survival. However the palliative effect seen with as required treatment was less satisfactory than with planned chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1654983      PMCID: PMC1977632          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1991.351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  14 in total

Review 1.  Measuring and analysing quality of life in cancer clinical trials: a review.

Authors:  P M Fayers; D R Jones
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1983 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Sample size requirements for evaluating a conservative therapy.

Authors:  R Makuch; R Simon
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1978-07

3.  Tables of the number of patients required in clinical trials using the logrank test.

Authors:  L S Freedman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1982 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Carboplatin (Paraplatin; JM8) and etoposide (VP-16) as first-line combination therapy for small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  I E Smith; B D Evans; M E Gore; M D Vincent; L Repetto; J R Yarnold; H T Ford
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Canadian multicenter randomized trial comparing sequential and alternating administration of two non-cross-resistant chemotherapy combinations in patients with limited small-cell carcinoma of the lung.

Authors:  R Feld; W K Evans; P Coy; I Hodson; A S MacDonald; D Osoba; D Payne; W Shelley; J L Pater
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Prognostic factors in small cell lung cancer: multivariate model based on 778 patients treated with chemotherapy with or without irradiation.

Authors:  K Osterlind; P K Andersen
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Quality of life during chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer: assessment and use of a daily diary card in a randomized trial.

Authors:  D M Geddes; L Dones; E Hill; K Law; P G Harper; S G Spiro; J S Tobias; R L Souhami
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Improving the quality of life during chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. A comparison of intermittent and continuous treatment strategies.

Authors:  A Coates; V Gebski; J F Bishop; P N Jeal; R L Woods; R Snyder; M H Tattersall; M Byrne; V Harvey; G Gill
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Improvement of long-term survival in extensive small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  D V Jackson; L D Case; P J Zekan; B L Powell; R D Caldwell; J D Bearden; E C Nelson; H B Muss; M R Cooper; F Richards
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Longevity in small cell lung cancer. A report to the Lung Cancer Subcommittee of the United Kingdom Coordinating Committee for Cancer Research.

Authors:  R L Souhami; K Law
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Chemotherapy for cancer patients who present late.

Authors:  Stella J Bowcock; Charles D Shee; Saad M B Rassam; Peter G Harper
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-06-12

2.  Economic and quality-of-life aspects of treating small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  P Graham; J Boyages
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Quality-of-life assessment in small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  P Fayers
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Measuring the effect of cancer on health-related quality of life.

Authors:  D Osoba
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Approaches to the analysis of quality of life data: experiences gained from a medical research council lung cancer working party palliative chemotherapy trial.

Authors:  P Hopwood; R J Stephens; D Machin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  Clinical trials in lung cancer: nihilism versus enthusiasm.

Authors:  S G Spiro
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 7.  MRC quality of life studies using a daily diary card--practical lessons learned from cancer trials.

Authors:  P Fayers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 8.  Modern management of small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Roberta Ferraldeschi; Sofia Baka; Babita Jyoti; Corinne Faivre-Finn; Nick Thatcher; Paul Lorigan
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  The health-related quality of life and survival of small-cell lung cancer patients: results of a companion study to CALGB 9033.

Authors:  M J Naughton; J E Herndon; S A Shumaker; A A Miller; A B Kornblith; D Chao; J Holland
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  A randomised trial of three or six courses of etoposide cyclophosphamide methotrexate and vincristine or six courses of etoposide and ifosfamide in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). II: Quality of life. Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party.

Authors:  N M Bleehen; D J Girling; D Machin; R J Stephens
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.