Y F Choi1, T W Wong, C C Lau. 1. Accident and Emergency Department, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong. choiyf@netvigator.com
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the effect of triage rapid initial assessment by doctor (TRIAD) on waiting time and processing time of an emergency department (ED) without extra staff. METHOD: A senior emergency doctor was put into triage instead of a consultation cubicle for seven shifts of 9 hours each. All the patients were assessed and necessary interventions started at the time of triage. Waiting time and processing time of various categories of patients were compared with a control group that was sampled during the week before the trial period. RESULTS: In total, there were 1310 cases in the trial period and 1355 controls. Over a quarter (27%) of the patients received triage doctor interventions. The average waiting time was reduced by 38% and the average processing time by 23%. Patients without triage intervention also had a 24% shorter waiting time because of overall improvement in efficiency. Trauma patients and patients needing radiography particularly benefited from the new system. The waiting time and processing time of category 4 and 5 patients improved significantly as a result of more efficient processing of more urgent cases. CONCLUSION: The waiting time and processing time of the ED were greatly reduced by TRIAD without extra manpower.
AIM: To evaluate the effect of triage rapid initial assessment by doctor (TRIAD) on waiting time and processing time of an emergency department (ED) without extra staff. METHOD: A senior emergency doctor was put into triage instead of a consultation cubicle for seven shifts of 9 hours each. All the patients were assessed and necessary interventions started at the time of triage. Waiting time and processing time of various categories of patients were compared with a control group that was sampled during the week before the trial period. RESULTS: In total, there were 1310 cases in the trial period and 1355 controls. Over a quarter (27%) of the patients received triage doctor interventions. The average waiting time was reduced by 38% and the average processing time by 23%. Patients without triage intervention also had a 24% shorter waiting time because of overall improvement in efficiency. Traumapatients and patients needing radiography particularly benefited from the new system. The waiting time and processing time of category 4 and 5 patients improved significantly as a result of more efficient processing of more urgent cases. CONCLUSION: The waiting time and processing time of the ED were greatly reduced by TRIAD without extra manpower.
Authors: David M Nestler; Alesia R Fratzke; Christopher J Church; Lori Scanlan-Hanson; Annie T Sadosty; Michael P Halasy; Janet L Finley; Andy Boggust; Erik P Hess Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Jason Imperato; Darren Scott Morris; David Binder; Christopher Fischer; John Patrick; Leon Dahomey Sanchez; Gary Setnik Journal: Intern Emerg Med Date: 2012-08-03 Impact factor: 3.397
Authors: David M Nestler; Michael P Halasy; Alesia R Fratzke; Christopher J Church; Lori N Scanlan-Hanson; Christine M Lohse; Ronna L Campbell; Annie T Sadosty; Erik P Hess Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2014-06-10 Impact factor: 3.451