Literature DB >> 16549099

An optimized protocol for hip joint centre determination using the functional method.

Valentina Camomilla1, Andrea Cereatti, Giuseppe Vannozzi, Aurelio Cappozzo.   

Abstract

The functional method identifies the hip joint centre (HJC) as the centre of rotation of the femur relative to the pelvis during an ad hoc movement normally recorded using stereophotogrammetry. This method may be used for the direct determination of subject-specific HJC coordinates or for creating a database from which regression equations may be derived that allow for the prediction of those coordinates. In order to contribute to the optimization of the functional method, the effects of the following factors were investigated: the algorithm used to estimate the HJC coordinates from marker coordinates, the type and amplitude of the movement of the femur relative to the pelvis, marker cluster location and dimensions, and the number of data samples. This was done using a simulation approach which, in turn, was validated using experiments made on a physical analogue of the pelvis and femur system. The algorithms used in the present context were classified and, in some instances, modified in order to optimize both accuracy and computation time, and submitted to a comparative evaluation. The type of movement that allowed for the most accurate results consisted of several flexion-extension/abduction-adduction movements performed on vertical planes of different orientations, followed by a circumduction movement. The accuracy of the HJC estimate improved, with an increasing rate, as a function of the amplitude of these movements. A sharp improvement was found as the number of the photogrammetric data samples used to describe the movement increased up to 500. For optimal performance with the recommended algorithms, markers were best located as far as possible from each other and with their centroid as close as possible to the HJC. By optimizing the analytical and experimental protocol, HJC location error not caused by soft tissue artefacts may be reduced by a factor of ten with a maximal expected value for such error of approximately 1mm.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16549099     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  28 in total

1.  Sensitivity of hip tissues contact evaluation to the methods used for estimating the hip joint center of rotation.

Authors:  Ehsan Arbabi; Jerome Schmid; Ronan Boulic; Daniel Thalmann; Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Frontal knee alignment: three-dimensional marker positions and clinical assessment.

Authors:  Benedicte Vanwanseele; David Parker; Myles Coolican
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Hip joint center localisation: A biomechanical application to hip arthroplasty population.

Authors:  Vicky Bouffard; Mickael Begon; Annick Champagne; Payam Farhadnia; Pascal-André Vendittoli; Martin Lavigne; François Prince
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2012-08-18

4.  In Vivo Pelvic and Hip Joint Kinematics in Patients With Cam Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Dual Fluoroscopy Study.

Authors:  Penny R Atkins; Niccolo M Fiorentino; Joseph A Hartle; Stephen K Aoki; Christopher L Peters; K Bo Foreman; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Relationships between varus-valgus laxity of the severely osteoarthritic knee and gait, instability, clinical performance, and function.

Authors:  Gregory M Freisinger; Erin E Hutter; Jacqueline Lewis; Jeffrey F Granger; Andrew H Glassman; Matthew D Beal; Xueliang Pan; Laura C Schmitt; Robert A Siston; Ajit M W Chaudhari
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  In-vivo quantification of dynamic hip joint center errors and soft tissue artifact.

Authors:  Niccolo M Fiorentino; Penny R Atkins; Michael J Kutschke; K Bo Foreman; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2016-09-11       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  Evidence for joint moment asymmetry in healthy populations during gait.

Authors:  Rebecca L Lathrop-Lambach; Jessica L Asay; Steve T Jamison; Xueliang Pan; Laura C Schmitt; Katerina Blazek; Robert A Siston; Thomas P Andriacchi; Ajit M W Chaudhari
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 2.840

8.  Accuracy of Functional and Predictive Methods to Calculate the Hip Joint Center in Young Non-pathologic Asymptomatic Adults with Dual Fluoroscopy as a Reference Standard.

Authors:  Niccolo M Fiorentino; Michael J Kutschke; Penny R Atkins; K Bo Foreman; Ashley L Kapron; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  Estimated forces and moments experienced by osseointegrated endoprostheses for lower extremity amputees.

Authors:  Carolyn E Taylor; Yue Zhang; Yuqing Qiu; Heath B Henninger; K Bo Foreman; Kent N Bachus
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.840

10.  Agonist and antagonist muscle activation in elite athletes: influence of age.

Authors:  Federico Quinzi; Valentina Camomilla; Francesco Felici; Alberto Di Mario; Paola Sbriccoli
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.