Literature DB >> 16548006

Long-term efficacy of transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure on migraine headache with aura and recurrent stroke.

Alessandro Giardini1, Andrea Donti, Roberto Formigari, Luisa Salomone, Gualtiero Palareti, Donata Guidetti, Fernando Maria Picchio.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the long-term results of transcatheter patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure on migraine headache with aura (MHA) and on the risk of recurrent stroke.
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter PFO closure is associated with an early improvement of MHA, and a reduction or the risk of recurrent cerebral ischemia, but the long-term outcome after the procedure is unknown.
METHODS: We analyzed follow-up data of 38 consecutive patients who had undergone transcatheter PFO closure at our institution because of cryptogenic stroke and had been followed-up for at least 3 years after the procedure. Mean age at closure was 43 +/- 13 years. Thirteen patients (34%) had a diagnosis of MHA made by the primary care physician or the referring neurologist. Migraine disability assessment questionnaire (MIDAS) was used to assess MHA incidence and severity.
RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 4.8 +/- 1.4 years, two patients had a recurrent stroke (13 and 15 months after the procedure, respectively). Recurrence rate 5 years after the procedure was 5.3%. After 4.9 +/- 1.4 years from the intervention, 12/13 patients (92%, 95% CI 65-99%) had complete resolution in their MHA. Overall, MIDAS score decreased significantly (38.6 +/- 26.3 vs. 4.4 +/- 5.1, P < 0.0001) after the procedure. One patient did not report any improvement of MHA after transcatheter PFO closure, whereas one patient reported a severe relapse of MHA about 1 year after PFO closure. Freedom from recurrent MHA 5 years after the procedure was 85% (95% CI 57-97%).
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of recurrent cerebral ischemia and recurrent MHA seems to be low at long-term follow-up after transcatheter PFO closure. Recurrent cerebral ischemia and relapse of MHA seem to be confined to the first 15 months after the procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16548006     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.20699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  5 in total

Review 1.  Patent foramen ovale and migraine: association, causation, and implications of clinical trials.

Authors:  Stewart J Tepper; Catalina Cleves; Frederick R Taylor
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2009-06

Review 2.  Patent foramen ovale closure and medical treatments for secondary stroke prevention: a systematic review of observational and randomized evidence.

Authors:  Georgios D Kitsios; Issa J Dahabreh; Abd Moain Abu Dabrh; David E Thaler; David M Kent
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 3.  Migraine and percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Jie Shi; Jun Lv; Xing-Ting Han; Guo-Gang Luo
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  Migraineurs with patent foramen ovale have larger right-to-left shunt despite similar atrial septal characteristics.

Authors:  Jill T Jesurum; Cindy J Fuller; Carles A Velez; Merrill P Spencer; Kimberly A Krabill; William H Likosky; William A Gray; John V Olsen; Mark Reisman
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 7.277

Review 5.  Patent foramen ovale and migraine.

Authors:  Hans-Christoph Diener; Tobias Kurth; David Dodick
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2007-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.