Literature DB >> 16547613

Does resection line involvement affect prognosis in early gastric cancer patients? An Italian multicentric study.

Paolo Morgagni1, Domenico Garcea, Daniele Marrelli, Giovanni de Manzoni, Giovanni Natalini, Hayato Kurihara, Alberto Marchet, Giovanni Vittimberga, Luca Saragoni, Franco Roviello, Alberto Di Leo, Francesco De Santis, Valerio Panizza, Donato Nitti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Resection line involvement has been indicated as an important prognostic factor for gastric cancer. Its late detection renders the choice of treatment difficult for surgeons.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We describe the multicenter experience of a group of 11 patients with early gastric carcinoma (EGC) and positive resection confirmed at histological examination who did not undergo surgical retreatment for reasons of associated disease, surgical considerations on duodenal stump, or patient refusal.
RESULTS: The gastric margin was involved in 4 patients, and 7 patients had duodenal resection line involvement. No surgical complications or postoperative deaths were observed. Five and 8-year survival was 100% and 86%, respectively. The only patient who relapsed did not have lymph node involvement and died from liver metastases, without local recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: It is sometimes difficult to accurately define the resection line in gastric cancer surgery, especially in the early stages of disease, but because of the strongly negative prognostic value of an infiltrated margin, frozen sections are recommended if neoplastic invasion is suspected and a new resection is always recommended if possible. Nevertheless, the good prognosis of resected EGC patients with resection line involvement must be considered before submitting patients with associated diseases to radical surgical retreatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16547613     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-005-7975-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.282


  18 in total

1.  Significance of a positive oesophageal margin in stomach cancer.

Authors:  W H Chan; W K Wong; L W Khin; H S Chan; K C Soo
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  2000-10

2.  THE TWO HISTOLOGICAL MAIN TYPES OF GASTRIC CARCINOMA: DIFFUSE AND SO-CALLED INTESTINAL-TYPE CARCINOMA. AN ATTEMPT AT A HISTO-CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION.

Authors:  P LAUREN
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand       Date:  1965

3.  Clinicopathologic features and prognostic significance of duodenal invasion in patients with distal gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Y Kakeji; S Tsujitani; H Baba; S Moriguchi; M Mori; Y Maehara; T Kamegawa; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Risk factors for lymph node metastases and their prognostic significance in early gastric cancer (EGC) for the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer (IRGGC).

Authors:  S Folli; P Morgagni; F Roviello; G De Manzoni; D Marrelli; L Saragoni; A Di Leo; M Gaudio; O Nanni; A Carli; C Cordiano; D Dell'Amore; A Vio
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Clinicopathologic characteristics of gastric cancer patients with cancer infiltration at surgical margin at gastrectomy.

Authors:  S Fujimoto; M Takahashi; T Mutou; K Kobayashi; T Toyosawa; H Ohkubo
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.480

6.  Early gastric carcinoma: spread and multicentricity.

Authors:  Michel Huguier; Leonardo Ferro; Alain Barrier
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 7.370

7.  Resection-line involvement in gastric cancer: a continuing problem.

Authors:  M T Hallissey; A J Jewkes; J A Dunn; L Ward; J W Fielding
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Histologically positive esophageal margin in the surgical treatment of gastric cancer.

Authors:  D N Papachristou; N Agnanti; H D'Agostino; J G Fortner
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Surgical treatment of patients with gastric carcinoma and duodenal invasion.

Authors:  Y Kakeji; D Korenaga; H Baba; A Watanabe; S Tsujitani; Y Maehara; K Sugimachi
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.454

10.  Effect of microscopic resection line disease on gastric cancer survival.

Authors:  S H Kim; M S Karpeh; D S Klimstra; D Leung; M F Brennan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.267

View more
  10 in total

1.  In vivo evaluation of a modified linear stapling device designed to facilitate accurate pathologic examination of the surgical margin.

Authors:  Hironori Tsujimoto; Hitoshi Tsuda; Shuichi Hiraki; Shinsuke Nomura; Nozomi Ito; Kyohei Kanematsu; Hiroyuki Horiguchi; Suefumi Aosasa; Junji Yamamoto; Kazuo Hase
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 2.  [R1 resection for gastric carcinoma].

Authors:  K Ridwelski; J Fahlke; M Huß; R Otto; S Wolff
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Length of negative resection margin does not affect local recurrence and survival in the patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Chang Min Lee; Ye Seob Jee; Ju-Hee Lee; Sang-Yong Son; Sang-Hoon Ahn; Do Joong Park; Hyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Lymph node pick up by separate stations: Option or necessity.

Authors:  Paolo Morgagni; Oriana Nanni; Elisa Carretta; Mattia Altini; Luca Saragoni; Fabio Falcini; Domenico Garcea
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-05-27

5.  Resection line involvement after gastric cancer surgery: clinical outcome in nonsurgically retreated patients.

Authors:  P Morgagni; D Garcea; D Marrelli; G De Manzoni; G Natalini; H Kurihara; A Marchet; L Saragoni; E Scarpi; C Pedrazzani; A Di Leo; F De Santis; V Panizzo; D Nitti; F Roviello
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Risk factor analysis for involvement of resection margins in gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer: an Italian multicenter study.

Authors:  Massimiliano Bissolati; Matteo Desio; Fausto Rosa; Stefano Rausei; Daniele Marrelli; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Giovanni De Manzoni; Damiano Chiari; Giovanni Guarneri; Fabio Pacelli; Lorenzo De Franco; Sarah Molfino; Chiara Cipollari; Elena Orsenigo
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 7.370

7.  Clinical importance and surgical decision-making regarding proximal resection margin for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Doosup Shin; Sung-Soo Park
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-01-15

Review 8.  Resection line involvement after gastric cancer treatment: handle with care.

Authors:  Paolo Morgagni; Giuliano La Barba; Eleonora Colciago; Giovanni Vittimberga; Giorgio Ercolani
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-06-23

9.  Clinical Application of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Technology in Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Meng Wei; Yize Liang; Limei Wang; Zhen Li; Yuanyuan Chen; Zhibo Yan; Danping Sun; Yadi Huang; Xin Zhong; Peng Liu; Wenbin Yu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Predictors of outcomes in patients with gastric cancer treated with contemporary multimodality strategies-a single institution experience.

Authors:  Tuyen Hoang; Michelle Park; Darryl Hiyama; Farshid Dayyani
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2020-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.