OBJECTIVES: To study the ability of the logistic EuroSCORE to predict operative risk in contemporary cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. SETTING: All National Health Service centres undertaking adult cardiac surgery in northwest England. PATIENTS: All patients undergoing cardiac surgery between April 2002 and March 2004. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The predictive ability of the logistic EuroSCORE was assessed by analysing how well it discriminates between patients with differing observed risk by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and studying how well it is calibrated against observed in-hospital mortality. The performance of the EuroSCORE was examined in the following surgical subgroups: all cardiac surgery, isolated coronary artery surgery, isolated valve surgery, combined valve and coronary surgery, mitral valve surgery, aortic valve surgery and other surgery. RESULTS: 9995 patients underwent surgery. The discrimination of the logistic EuroSCORE was good with a ROC curve area of 0.79 for all cardiac surgery (range 0.71-0.79 in the subgroups). For all operations, the predicted mortality was 5.7% and observed mortality was 3.3%. The logistic EuroSCORE overpredicted observed mortality for all subgroups but by differing degrees (p = 0.02) CONCLUSIONS: The logistic EuroSCORE is a reasonable overall predictor for contemporary cardiac surgery but overestimates observed mortality. Its accuracy at predicting risk in different surgical subgroups varies. The logistic EuroSCORE should be recalibrated before it is used to gain reassurance about outcomes. Caution should be exercised when using it to compare hospitals or surgeons with a different operative case mix.
OBJECTIVES: To study the ability of the logistic EuroSCORE to predict operative risk in contemporary cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. SETTING: All National Health Service centres undertaking adult cardiac surgery in northwest England. PATIENTS: All patients undergoing cardiac surgery between April 2002 and March 2004. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The predictive ability of the logistic EuroSCORE was assessed by analysing how well it discriminates between patients with differing observed risk by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and studying how well it is calibrated against observed in-hospital mortality. The performance of the EuroSCORE was examined in the following surgical subgroups: all cardiac surgery, isolated coronary artery surgery, isolated valve surgery, combined valve and coronary surgery, mitral valve surgery, aortic valve surgery and other surgery. RESULTS: 9995 patients underwent surgery. The discrimination of the logistic EuroSCORE was good with a ROC curve area of 0.79 for all cardiac surgery (range 0.71-0.79 in the subgroups). For all operations, the predicted mortality was 5.7% and observed mortality was 3.3%. The logistic EuroSCORE overpredicted observed mortality for all subgroups but by differing degrees (p = 0.02) CONCLUSIONS: The logistic EuroSCORE is a reasonable overall predictor for contemporary cardiac surgery but overestimates observed mortality. Its accuracy at predicting risk in different surgical subgroups varies. The logistic EuroSCORE should be recalibrated before it is used to gain reassurance about outcomes. Caution should be exercised when using it to compare hospitals or surgeons with a different operative case mix.
Authors: F Roques; S A Nashef; P Michel; E Gauducheau; C de Vincentiis; E Baudet; J Cortina; M David; A Faichney; F Gabrielle; E Gams; A Harjula; M T Jones; P P Pintor; R Salamon; L Thulin Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Shishir Karthik; Arun K Srinivasan; Antony D Grayson; Mark Jackson; David A C Sharpe; Daniel J M Keenan; Ben Bridgewater; Brian M Fabri Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Hanna Barmettler; Franz F Immer; Pascal A Berdat; Friedrich S Eckstein; Beat Kipfer; Thierry P Carrel Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Ben Bridgewater; Anthony D Grayson; Mark Jackson; Nicholas Brooks; Geir J Grotte; Daniel J M Keenan; Russell Millner; Brian M Fabri; Mark Jones Journal: BMJ Date: 2003-07-05
Authors: Shengshou Hu; Zhe Zheng; Xin Yuan; Yun Wang; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Joseph S Ross; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2012-03-06
Authors: Tom Kai Ming Wang; Timothy Oh; Jamie Voss; Greg Gamble; Nicholas Kang; James Pemberton Journal: Heart Vessels Date: 2014-01-25 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Alexandre Mebazaa; Antonis A Pitsis; Alain Rudiger; Wolfgang Toller; Dan Longrois; Sven-Erik Ricksten; Ilona Bobek; Stefan De Hert; Georg Wieselthaler; Uwe Schirmer; Ludwig K von Segesser; Michael Sander; Don Poldermans; Marco Ranucci; Peter C J Karpati; Patrick Wouters; Manfred Seeberger; Edith R Schmid; Walter Weder; Ferenc Follath Journal: Crit Care Date: 2010-04-28 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: J F Gummert; A Funkat; B Osswald; A Beckmann; W Schiller; A Krian; F Beyersdorf; A Haverich; J Cremer Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2009-03-05 Impact factor: 5.460