Literature DB >> 16545294

[How are the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations to be classified?].

M Marzo-Castillejo, P Alonso-Coello, R Rotaeche del Campo.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2006        PMID： 16545294      PMCID： PMC8149144          DOI： 10.1157/13083926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aten Primaria        ISSN： 0212-6567            Impact factor:   1.137


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  Are all evidence-based practices alike? Problems in the ranking of evidence.

Authors:  Ross E G Upshur
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-09-30       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Letters, numbers, symbols and words: how to communicate grades of evidence and recommendations.

Authors:  Holger J Schünemann; Dana Best; Gunn Vist; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-09-30       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Simplifying the language of evidence to improve patient care: Strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in medical literature.

Authors:  Mark H Ebell; Jay Siwek; Barry D Weiss; Steven H Woolf; Jeffrey L Susman; Bernard Ewigman; Marjorie Bowman
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 0.493

4.  Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

Authors:  David Atkins; Dana Best; Peter A Briss; Martin Eccles; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Signe Flottorp; Gordon H Guyatt; Robin T Harbour; Margaret C Haugh; David Henry; Suzanne Hill; Roman Jaeschke; Gillian Leng; Alessandro Liberati; Nicola Magrini; James Mason; Philippa Middleton; Jacek Mrukowicz; Dianne O'Connell; Andrew D Oxman; Bob Phillips; Holger J Schünemann; Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer; Helena Varonen; Gunn E Vist; John W Williams; Stephanie Zaza
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-06-19

5.  [The scientific trajectory of semFYC. Where do we want to get to?].

Authors:  M Marzo; J Basora; R Rotaeche; J Mascort
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 1.137

6.  Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group.

Authors:  David Atkins; Martin Eccles; Signe Flottorp; Gordon H Guyatt; David Henry; Suzanne Hill; Alessandro Liberati; Dianne O'Connell; Andrew D Oxman; Bob Phillips; Holger Schünemann; Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer; Gunn E Vist; John W Williams
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: pilot study of a new system.

Authors:  David Atkins; Peter A Briss; Martin Eccles; Signe Flottorp; Gordon H Guyatt; Robin T Harbour; Suzanne Hill; Roman Jaeschke; Alessandro Liberati; Nicola Magrini; James Mason; Dianne O'Connell; Andrew D Oxman; Bob Phillips; Holger Schünemann; Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer; Gunn E Vist; John W Williams
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 2.655
  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  [semFYC also adopts the GRADE system].

Authors:  Mercè Marzo Castillejo; Rafael Rotaeche del Campo; Josep Basora Gallifa
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 1.137

2.  Gaining insight into the Clinical Practice Guideline development processes: qualitative study in a workshop to implement the GRADE proposal in Spain.

Authors:  Carlos Calderón; Rafael Rotaeche; Arritxu Etxebarria; Mercé Marzo; Rosa Rico; Marta Barandiaran
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 2.655
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.