Literature DB >> 14764293

Simplifying the language of evidence to improve patient care: Strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in medical literature.

Mark H Ebell1, Jay Siwek, Barry D Weiss, Steven H Woolf, Jeffrey L Susman, Bernard Ewigman, Marjorie Bowman.   

Abstract

Several taxonomies exist for rating individual studies and the strength of recommendations, making the analysis of evidence confusing for practitioners. A new grading scale-the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT)-will be used by several family medicine and primary care journals (required or optional), allowing readers to learn 1 consistently applied taxonomy of evidence. SORT is built around the information mastery framework, which emphasizes the use of patient-oriented outcomes that measure changes in morbidity or mortality. Levels of evidence from 1 to 3 for individual studies also are defined. An A-level recommendation is based on consistent and good-quality patient-oriented evidence; a B-level recommendation is based on inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; and a C-level recommendation is based on consensus, usual practice, opinion, disease-oriented evidence, or case series for studies of diagnosis, treatment, prevention, or screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14764293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  24 in total

Review 1.  Corticosteroids for HELLP (haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets) syndrome.

Authors:  Timothy L Clenney; Anthony J Viera
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-31

2.  The role of title, metadata and abstract in identifying clinically relevant journal articles.

Authors:  Dina Demner-Fushman; Susan Hauser; George Thoma
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

3.  "Bag of words" is not enough for strength of evidence classification.

Authors:  Jimmy Lin; Dina Demner-Fushman
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

4.  A guide to the Canadian Medical Association handbook on clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Valerie A Palda; Dave Davis; Joanne Goldman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Double-dose vitamin D lowers cancer risk in women over 55.

Authors:  Sarah-Anne Schumann; Bernard Ewigman
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 0.493

6.  [How are the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations to be classified?].

Authors:  M Marzo-Castillejo; P Alonso-Coello; R Rotaeche del Campo
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.137

Review 7.  Getting patients to exercise more: a systematic review of underserved populations.

Authors:  Jennifer K Carroll; Kevin Fiscella; Ronald M Epstein; Pascal Jean-Pierre; Colmar Figueroa-Moseley; Geoffrey C Williams; Karen M Mustian; Gary R Morrow
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.493

Review 8.  Critical appraisal of scientific articles: part 1 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications.

Authors:  Jean-Baptist du Prel; Bernd Röhrig; Maria Blettner
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 9.  Outcome-Relevant Effects of Shared Decision Making.

Authors:  Katarina Hauser; Armin Koerfer; Kathrin Kuhr; Christian Albus; Stefan Herzig; Jan Matthes
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 5.594

10.  Heterogeneity in cancer guidelines: should we eradicate or tolerate?

Authors:  G Pentheroudakis; R Stahel; H Hansen; N Pavlidis
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 32.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.