Literature DB >> 16544314

Response measurement after intraarterial chemoradiation in advanced head and neck carcinoma: magnetic resonance imaging and evaluation under general anesthesia?

Guido B van den Broek1, Coen R N Rasch, Frank A Pameijer, Ellen Peter, Michiel W M van den Brekel, Alfons J M Balm.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this prospective trial were to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to use MRI evaluation under general anesthesia (EGA) 6 to 8 weeks after chemoradiation to determine local control.
METHODS: Eighty-two consecutive patients with advanced-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or supraglottic larynx were treated with selective targeted chemoradiation. All patients who completed treatment and survived had a minimum follow-up of 3 years. MRI and EGA were performed from 6 to 8 weeks after treatment. Posttreatment MRI findings were compared with pretreatment MRI findings and were graded for risk of local recurrence/residual disease on a 4-point scale. The diagnosis of treatment failure was based on tissue biopsies, which were obtained during EGA or later during follow-up. The predictive value of MRI was analyzed by using a Cox proportional hazards model.
RESULTS: Only 1 patient with MRI Grade 0 or 1 findings (discrete mass < 10 mm; n = 62 patients) had residual disease 6 to 8 weeks after treatment that was detected during EGA. In 5 patients with MRI findings of Grade 2a and 2b (mass > 10 mm; n = 20 patients), residual disease was detected. After 2 years, 23 patients had a local failure (28%). Twelve local failures were found among 62 patients who had MRI findings of Grade 0 and 1. Posttreatment MRI emerged as an independent predictive factor (hazard ratio, 3.0; P = .014) for local control.
CONCLUSIONS: Posttreatment MRI studies provided predictive information on local control in addition to pretreatment predictors. In patients with focal masses < 10 mm, the combination of response evaluation under general anesthesia and posttreatment MRI from 6 to 8 weeks after chemoradiation hardly provided more information on the local control than posttreatment MRI alone. 2006 American Cancer Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16544314     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of nodal response after intra-arterial chemoradiation for node-positive head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Tomohiro Sakashita; Akihiro Homma; Nobuhiko Oridate; Hiromitsu Hatakeyama; Satoshi Kano; Takatsugu Mizumachi; Satoshi Fukuda
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Head and neck cancer: how imaging predicts treatment outcome.

Authors:  Robert Hermans
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 3.  Assessment of treatment response after chemoradiation of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Fernando Luiz Dias
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Response evaluation after chemoradiotherapy for advanced staged oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a nationwide survey in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Charlotte S Schouten; Otto S Hoekstra; C René Leemans; Jonas A Castelijns; Remco de Bree
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Limited utility of routine surveillance MRI following chemoradiation for advanced-stage oropharynx carcinoma.

Authors:  Gerald T Kangelaris; Sue S Yom; Kim Huang; Steven J Wang
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-08-31

6.  T2-weighted MR imaging early after chemoradiotherapy to evaluate treatment response in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  A D King; C K Keung; K-H Yu; F K F Mo; K S Bhatia; D K W Yeung; G M K Tse; A C Vlantis; A T Ahuja
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  A predictive model for residual disease after (chemo) radiotherapy in oropharyngeal carcinoma: Combined radiological and clinical evaluation of tumor response.

Authors:  Zeno A R Gouw; Bas Jasperse; Jan-Jakob Sonke; Wilma D Heemsbergen; Arash Navran; Olga Hamming-Vrieze; Jan Paul de Boer; Michiel W M van den Brekel; Abrahim Al-Mamgani
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-08-04

8.  Cost-effectiveness of response evaluation after chemoradiation in patients with advanced oropharyngeal cancer using 18F-FDG-PET-CT and/or diffusion-weighted MRI.

Authors:  Marjolein Je Greuter; Charlotte S Schouten; Jonas A Castelijns; Pim de Graaf; Emile Fi Comans; Otto S Hoekstra; Remco de Bree; Veerle Mh Coupé
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  MRI in head and neck cancer following chemoradiotherapy: what is the optimal delay to demonstrate maximal response?

Authors:  S E J Connor; C Burd; N Sivarasan; V Goh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 5.315

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.