Literature DB >> 25373839

Response evaluation after chemoradiotherapy for advanced staged oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a nationwide survey in the Netherlands.

Charlotte S Schouten1, Otto S Hoekstra2, C René Leemans1, Jonas A Castelijns2, Remco de Bree3.   

Abstract

Following failure of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for advanced staged oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC), residual tumor can often be treated successfully with salvage surgery, if detected early. Current clinical practice in the VU University Medical Center is to perform routine response evaluation, i.e., examination under general anesthesia (EUA), 12 weeks after treatment. However, in the Netherlands there is no consensus on response evaluation in patients with advanced oropharyngeal cancer. Questionnaire on current clinical practice concerning response evaluation after CRT for advanced OPSCC in all eight head and neck cancer centers of the Dutch Head and Neck Oncology Cooperative Group. The response rate was 100%. Response evaluation was routinely performed with various methods in five institutions (62.5%) and in one institute (12.5%) only if clinical evaluation was difficult. Two centers (25%) did not perform response evaluation. In case of suspicion of residual disease during follow-up, six centers (75%) performed imaging prior to EUA and two centers (25%) only if clinical evaluation was difficult. Diagnostic techniques used prior to EUA were MRI (87.5%), diffusion-weighted MRI (37.5%), 18F-FDG-PET-CT (75-87.5%) and CT (37.5%). This survey shows a substantial variation in the diagnostic policy concerning response evaluation after CRT for advanced OPSCC in the Netherlands. There is a need for guidelines for response evaluation in patients with advanced oropharyngeal cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-FDG-PET-CT; Chemoradiotherapy; DW-MRI; Examination under general anesthesia; Oropharyngeal cancer; Response evaluation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25373839     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-014-3389-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  33 in total

1.  Chemotherapy added to locoregional treatment for head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma: three meta-analyses of updated individual data. MACH-NC Collaborative Group. Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy on Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  J P Pignon; J Bourhis; C Domenge; L Designé
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-03-18       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Basic principles of diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Roland Bammer
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Detection of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with diffusion weighted MRI after (chemo)radiotherapy: correlation between radiologic and histopathologic findings.

Authors:  Vincent Vandecaveye; Frederik De Keyzer; Sandra Nuyts; Karen Deraedt; Piet Dirix; Pascal Hamaekers; Vincent Vander Poorten; Pierre Delaere; Robert Hermans
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  The Netherlands protocol for standardisation and quantification of FDG whole body PET studies in multi-centre trials.

Authors:  Ronald Boellaard; Wim J G Oyen; Corneline J Hoekstra; Otto S Hoekstra; Eric P Visser; Antoon T Willemsen; Bertjan Arends; Fred J Verzijlbergen; Josee Zijlstra; Anne M Paans; Emile F I Comans; Jan Pruim
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  MRI appearance of radiation-induced changes of normal cervical tissues.

Authors:  A Nömayr; M Lell; R Sweeney; W Bautz; P Lukas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  The value of positron emission tomography for monitoring response to radiotherapy in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Bianca M Klabbers; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Ben J Slotman
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  A novel approach for reduction of brown fat uptake on FDG PET.

Authors:  A Agrawal; N Nair; N S Baghel
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Low-dose oral propranolol could reduce brown adipose tissue F-18 FDG uptake in patients undergoing PET scans.

Authors:  Oscar Parysow; Ana M Mollerach; Victor Jager; Silvina Racioppi; Jose San Roman; Victor H Gerbaudo
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 7.794

9.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging including bi-exponential fitting for the detection of recurrent or residual tumour after (chemo)radiotherapy for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers.

Authors:  Dechen W Tshering Vogel; Peter Zbaeren; Andreas Geretschlaeger; Peter Vermathen; Frederik De Keyzer; Harriet C Thoeny
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of positron emission tomography in the follow up of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma following radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  M G Isles; C McConkey; H M Mehanna
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.597

View more
  6 in total

1.  Qualitative interpretation of PET scans using a Likert scale to assess neck node response to radiotherapy in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Johanna Sjövall; Ulrika Bitzén; Elisabeth Kjellén; Per Nilsson; Peter Wahlberg; Eva Brun
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Post-treatment 18F-FDG-PET/CT versus contrast-enhanced CT in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: comparative effectiveness study.

Authors:  Mehdi Taghipour; Esther Mena; Matthew J Kruse; Sara Sheikhbahaei; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.690

3.  CT-based follow-up following radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer; outcome and development of a prognostic model for regional control.

Authors:  Daan Nevens; Olivier Vantomme; Annouschka Laenen; Robert Hermans; Sandra Nuyts
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  A predictive model for residual disease after (chemo) radiotherapy in oropharyngeal carcinoma: Combined radiological and clinical evaluation of tumor response.

Authors:  Zeno A R Gouw; Bas Jasperse; Jan-Jakob Sonke; Wilma D Heemsbergen; Arash Navran; Olga Hamming-Vrieze; Jan Paul de Boer; Michiel W M van den Brekel; Abrahim Al-Mamgani
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-08-04

5.  Cost-effectiveness of response evaluation after chemoradiation in patients with advanced oropharyngeal cancer using 18F-FDG-PET-CT and/or diffusion-weighted MRI.

Authors:  Marjolein Je Greuter; Charlotte S Schouten; Jonas A Castelijns; Pim de Graaf; Emile Fi Comans; Otto S Hoekstra; Remco de Bree; Veerle Mh Coupé
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Surgical rescue for persistent head and neck cancer after first-line treatment.

Authors:  Teresa Bernadette Steinbichler; L Golm; D Dejaco; D Riedl; B Kofler; C Url; D Wolfram; H Riechelmann
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-01-25       Impact factor: 2.503

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.