Literature DB >> 16544084

The "stamp method": a new treatment for perforated peptic ulcer?

M J O E Bertleff1, R S B Liem, H L Bartels, P H Robinson, J F A Van der Werff, H J Bonjer, J F Lange.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to develop a simple method for closure of a perforated peptic ulcer, making it more accessible for laparoscopic surgery.
METHODS: An experimental pilot study was performed using five male Wistar rats. The perforation was closed by a bioabsorbable patch made of lactide-glycolid-caprolactone fixed with glue onto the outside of the stomach.
RESULTS: Postoperatively, there were no signs of leakage or other complications. Histologically, there were no signs of inflammation on the inside of the stomach, and there was a 50% reduction of the perforation each successive postoperative week. No adverse reactions because of the degradable material or glue were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of a perforated peptic ulcer by placing a patch of biodegradable material like a "stamp" on the outside of the stomach is a feasible option.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16544084     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-004-2157-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  8 in total

1.  Emergency laparoscopy: a community hospital experience.

Authors:  F Agresta; I Michelet; G Coluci; N Bedin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Sandhya A Lagoo; Theodore N Pappas
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Experimental endoscopic repair of gastric perforations with an omental patch and clips.

Authors:  K Hashiba; A M Carvalho; G Diniz; N Barbosa de Aridrade; C A Guedes; L Siqueira Filho; C A Lima; H E Coehlo; R A de Oliveira; A M Carvaiho; H E Coetho
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Comparison between laparoscopic and conventional omental patch repair for perforated duodenal ulcer.

Authors:  J B Sø; C K Kum; M L Fernandes; P Goh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Wing T Siu; Heng T Leong; Bonita K B Law; Chun H Chau; Anthony C N Li; Kai H Fung; Yuk P Tai; Michael K W Li
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  A randomized study comparing laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer using suture or sutureless technique.

Authors:  W Y Lau; K L Leung; K H Kwong; I C Davey; C Robertson; J J Dawson; S C Chung; A K Li
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Combined laparoscopic-endoscopic method using an omental plug for therapy of gastroduodenal ulcer perforation.

Authors:  P Pescatore; N Halkic; J M Calmes; A Blum; M Gillet
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Color coding of sutures in laparoscopic perforated duodenal ulcer: a new concept.

Authors:  Simon Wemyss-Holden; Steven A White; Gavin Robertson; David Lloyd
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.719

  8 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Use of cyanoacrylate adhesives in general surgery.

Authors:  David García Cerdá; Antonio Martín Ballester; Alicia Aliena-Valero; Anna Carabén-Redaño; José M Lloris
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Repair of gastric defects with an equine pericardial patch.

Authors:  Kostantinos Spiliopoulos; Charalampos Markakis; Periklis Tomos; Hariklia Gakiopoulou; Ioannis Nikolopoulos; Eleftherios Spartalis; Kostantinos Kontzoglou; Michael Safioleas
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Comparison of closure of gastric perforation ulcers with biodegradable lactide-glycolide-caprolactone or omental patches.

Authors:  Marietta J O E Bertleff; Toon Stegmann; Robert S B Liem; Geert Kors; Peter H Robinson; Jean Philippe Nicolai; Johan F Lange
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Laparoscopic versus open management of duodenal perforation: a comparative study at a District General Hospital.

Authors:  Ashish Motewar; Mandar Tilak; Deepak Patil; Nikhil Bhamare; Laxmikant Bhople
Journal:  Prz Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-10-28

5.  Emergent laparoscopy in treatment of perforated peptic ulcer: a local experience from a tertiary centre in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Hamed Al Wadaani
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of the perforated peptic ulcer: the LAMA Trial.

Authors:  Mariëtta J O E Bertleff; Jens A Halm; Willem A Bemelman; Arie C van der Ham; Erwin van der Harst; Hok I Oei; J F Smulders; E W Steyerberg; Johan F Lange
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.352

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.