Literature DB >> 16543461

State-dependent learned valuation drives choice in an invertebrate.

Lorena Pompilio1, Alex Kacelnik, Spencer T Behmer.   

Abstract

Humans and other vertebrates occasionally show a preference for items remembered to be costly or experienced when the subject was in a poor condition (this is known as a sunk-costs fallacy or state-dependent valuation). Whether these mechanisms shared across vertebrates are the result of convergence toward an adaptive solution or evolutionary relicts reflecting common ancestral traits is unknown. Here we show that state-dependent valuation also occurs in an invertebrate, the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Given the latter's phylogenetic and neurobiological distance from those groups in which the phenomenon was already known, we suggest that state-dependent valuation mechanisms are probably ecologically rational solutions to widespread problems of choice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16543461     DOI: 10.1126/science.1123924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  47 in total

Review 1.  Opponency revisited: competition and cooperation between dopamine and serotonin.

Authors:  Y-Lan Boureau; Peter Dayan
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 2.  Calculating utility: preclinical evidence for cost-benefit analysis by mesolimbic dopamine.

Authors:  Paul E M Phillips; Mark E Walton; Thomas C Jhou
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Outcome expectations drive learned behaviour in larval Drosophila.

Authors:  Bertram Gerber; Thomas Hendel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Within-trial contrast: when is a failure to replicate not a type I error?

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall; Rebecca A Singer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Failure to replicate the 'work ethic" effect in pigeons.

Authors:  Marco Vasconcelos; Peter J Urcuioli; Karen M Lionello-DeNolf
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Deprivation level and choice in pigeons: a test of within-trial contrast.

Authors:  Marco Vasconcelos; Peter J Urcuioli
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Within-trial contrast: when you see it and when you don't.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Within-trial contrast: pigeons prefer conditioned reinforcers that follow a relatively more rather than a less aversive event.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall; Rebecca A Singer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 9.  Foraging for foundations in decision neuroscience: insights from ethology.

Authors:  Dean Mobbs; Pete C Trimmer; Daniel T Blumstein; Peter Dayan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Within-trial contrast: The effect of probability of reinforcement in training.

Authors:  Cassandra D Gipson; Holly C Miller; Jérôme J D Alessandri; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 1.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.