Literature DB >> 16543180

Compound mimicry and trading predators by the males of sexually dimorphic Batesian mimics.

Ximena J Nelson1, Robert R Jackson.   

Abstract

Sexual dimorphism is pronounced in Myrmarachne, a large genus of ant-like jumping spiders (Salticidae) and one of the major animal groups in which Batesian mimicry of ants has evolved. Although adult females and juveniles of both sexes are distinctly ant-like in appearance, Myrmarachne males have elongated chelicerae that might appear to detract from their resemblance to ants. Experimental findings suggest that the Myrmarachne male's solution is to adopt compound mimicry (i.e. the male's model seems to be not simply an ant worker but a combination of an ant and something carried in the ant's mandibles: an "encumbered ant"). By becoming a mimic of a particular subset of worker ants, Myrmarachne males may have retained their Batesian-mimicry defence against ant-averse predators, but at the price of receiving the unwanted attention of predators for which encumbered ants are preferred prey. Two salticid species were used as predators in the experiments. Portia fimbriata is known to choose other salticids as preferred prey and to avoid unencumbered ants and their mimics (Myrmarachne females). In experiments reported here, P. fimbriata avoided encumbered ants and Myrmarachne males. Ants are the preferred prey of Chalcotropis gulosus. In our experiments, C. gulosus chose safer encumbered ants in preference to more dangerous unencumbered ants, chose Myrmarachne males more often than Myrmarachne females and showed no evidence of distinguishing between Myrmarachne males and encumbered ants. The cost of reconciling sexual dimorphism with Batesian mimicry appears to be that Myrmarachne males attract the unwanted attention of specialist predators of their compound model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16543180      PMCID: PMC1560045          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  5 in total

1.  Rearing environment affects behaviour of jumping spiders.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Interpopulation variation in the risk-related decisions of Portia labiata, an araneophagic jumping spider (Araneae, Salticidae), during predatory sequences with spitting spiders.

Authors:  Robert R Jackson; Simon D Pollard; Daiqin Li; Natasha Fijn
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2002-09-04       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Evasive mimicry: when (if ever) could mimicry based on difficulty of capture evolve?

Authors:  G D Ruxton; M Speed; T N Sherratt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The evolution of mimicry under constraints.

Authors:  Øistein Haugsten Holen; Rufus A Johnstone
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-09-29       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Predators favour mimicry in a tropical reef fish.

Authors:  M Julian Caley; Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

  5 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  The multiple disguises of spiders: web colour and decorations, body colour and movement.

Authors:  Marc Théry; Jérôme Casas
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Aggressive use of Batesian mimicry by an ant-like jumping spider.

Authors:  Ximena J Nelson; Robert R Jackson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Constraints on the jumping and prey-capture abilities of ant-mimicking spiders (Salticidae, Salticinae, Myrmarachne).

Authors:  Yoshiaki Hashimoto; Tomoji Endo; Takeshi Yamasaki; Fujio Hyodo; Takao Itioka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.