Tony Ryan1, Pam Enderby, Alan S Rigby. 1. Department of Community, Ageing and Rehabilitation, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Sheffield, UK. t.ryan@Sheffield.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare intensive with non-intensive home-based rehabilitation provision following stroke or hip fracture in old age (65 years+). DESIGN: Parallel single-blind randomized control trial. SETTING:Domiciliary provided multidisciplinary rehabilitation. SUBJECTS:One hundred and sixty patients aged 65 or over recently discharged from hospital after suffering a stroke or hip fracture. INTERVENTION: Patients assigned to receive six or more face-to-face contacts or three or less face-to-face contacts from members of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation team. MAIN MEASURES: Patients assessed using the Barthel Index, Therapy Outcome Measure, Euroqol 5D (EQ-5D), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Frenchay Activities Index (FAI) at three months. All follow-up assessments were conducted blind to allocation. RESULTS: Subgroup analysis was conducted on the basis of incident condition (stroke or hip fracture). Significant differences were detected for the stroke subgroup at three months [Therapy Outcome Measure Handicap (median difference 0.5 (P< 0.05)) and EQ-5D (median difference 0.17 (P< 0.05))] and in change at three months [Therapy Outcome Measure (mean difference 0.52 (SD 0.85) 95% CI (0.16, 0.88)) and EQ-5D (mean difference 0.15 (SD 0.25) 95% CI (0.05, 0.26))]. No significant differences were detected between the two arms of the study for the hip fracture subgroup. CONCLUSION: Following stroke older people who receive a moreintensive community-based multidisciplinary rehabilitation service may experience short-term benefit in relation to social participation and some aspects of health-related quality of life. A more intensive service after discharge from hospital following a hip fracture is unlikely to result in similar patient benefit.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare intensive with non-intensive home-based rehabilitation provision following stroke or hip fracture in old age (65 years+). DESIGN: Parallel single-blind randomized control trial. SETTING: Domiciliary provided multidisciplinary rehabilitation. SUBJECTS: One hundred and sixty patients aged 65 or over recently discharged from hospital after suffering a stroke or hip fracture. INTERVENTION: Patients assigned to receive six or more face-to-face contacts or three or less face-to-face contacts from members of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation team. MAIN MEASURES: Patients assessed using the Barthel Index, Therapy Outcome Measure, Euroqol 5D (EQ-5D), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Frenchay Activities Index (FAI) at three months. All follow-up assessments were conducted blind to allocation. RESULTS: Subgroup analysis was conducted on the basis of incident condition (stroke or hip fracture). Significant differences were detected for the stroke subgroup at three months [Therapy Outcome Measure Handicap (median difference 0.5 (P< 0.05)) and EQ-5D (median difference 0.17 (P< 0.05))] and in change at three months [Therapy Outcome Measure (mean difference 0.52 (SD 0.85) 95% CI (0.16, 0.88)) and EQ-5D (mean difference 0.15 (SD 0.25) 95% CI (0.05, 0.26))]. No significant differences were detected between the two arms of the study for the hip fracture subgroup. CONCLUSION: Following stroke older people who receive a more intensive community-based multidisciplinary rehabilitation service may experience short-term benefit in relation to social participation and some aspects of health-related quality of life. A more intensive service after discharge from hospital following a hip fracture is unlikely to result in similar patient benefit.
Authors: David J Keene; Colin Forde; Thavapriya Sugavanam; Mark A Williams; Sarah E Lamb Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2020-07-04 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: William E Haley; Jessica Y Allen; Joan S Grant; Olivio J Clay; Martinique Perkins; David L Roth Journal: Stroke Date: 2009-04-30 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Zhomart Orman; Amanda G Thrift; Muideen T Olaiya; David Ung; Dominique A Cadilhac; Thanh Phan; Mark R Nelson; Velandai K Srikanth; Jason Vuong; Christopher F Bladin; Richard P Gerraty; Sharyn M Fitzgerald; Judith Frayne; Joosup Kim Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Matthew T D Dyer; Kimberley A Goldsmith; Linda S Sharples; Martin J Buxton Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2010-01-28 Impact factor: 3.186