Literature DB >> 16540643

Common cancer biomarkers.

Christopher F Basil1, Yingdong Zhao, Katia Zavaglia, Ping Jin, Monica C Panelli, Sonia Voiculescu, Susanna Mandruzzato, Hueling M Lee, Barbara Seliger, Ralph S Freedman, Phil R Taylor, Nan Hu, Paola Zanovello, Francesco M Marincola, Ena Wang.   

Abstract

There is an increasing interest in complementing conventional histopathologic evaluation with molecular tools that could increase the sensitivity and specificity of cancer staging for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. This study strove to identify cancer-specific markers for the molecular detection of a broad range of cancer types. We used 373 archival samples inclusive of normal tissues of various lineages and benign or malignant tumors (predominantly colon, melanoma, ovarian, and esophageal cancers). All samples were processed identically and cohybridized with an identical reference RNA source to a custom-made cDNA array platform. The database was split into training (n = 201) and comparable prediction (n = 172) sets. Leave-one-out cross-validation and gene pairing analysis identified putative cancer biomarkers overexpressed by malignant lesions independent of tissue of derivation. In particular, seven gene pairs were identified with high predictive power (87%) in segregating malignant from benign lesions. Receiver operator characteristic curves based on the same genes could segregate malignant from benign tissues with 94% accuracy. The relevance of this study rests on the identification of a restricted number of biomarkers ubiquitously expressed by cancers of distinct histology. This has not been done before. These biomarkers could be used broadly to increase the sensitivity and accuracy of cancer staging and early detection of locoregional or systemic recurrence. Their selective expression by cancerous compared with paired normal tissues suggests an association with the oncogenic process resulting in stable expression during disease progression when the presently used differentiation markers are unreliable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16540643     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  49 in total

1.  Cutaneous melanoma in situ: translational evidence from a large population-based study.

Authors:  Simone Mocellin; Donato Nitti
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-05-31

Review 2.  Biomarker method validation in anticancer drug development.

Authors:  J Cummings; T H Ward; A Greystoke; M Ranson; C Dive
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Microarray methods for protein biomarker detection.

Authors:  Hye Jin Lee; Alastair W Wark; Robert M Corn
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 4.616

4.  Signatures associated with rejection or recurrence in HER-2/neu-positive mammary tumors.

Authors:  Andrea Worschech; Maciej Kmieciak; Keith L Knutson; Harry D Bear; Aladar A Szalay; Ena Wang; Francesco M Marincola; Masoud H Manjili
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Prospective nested case-control study of feature genes related to leukemic evolution of myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Yan Ma; Bobin Chen; Xiaoping Xu; Guowei Lin
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 2.316

6.  Immunoscreening of urinary bladder cancer cDNA library and identification of potential tumor antigen.

Authors:  Ling Chen; Wei Chen; Le Zhao; Hai-Zhen Yu; Xu Li
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Identifying common prognostic factors in genomic cancer studies: a novel index for censored outcomes.

Authors:  Sigrid Rouam; Thierry Moreau; Philippe Broët
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Gene and microRNA analysis of neutrophils from patients with polycythemia vera and essential thrombocytosis: down-regulation of micro RNA-1 and -133a.

Authors:  Stefanie Slezak; Ping Jin; Lorraine Caruccio; Jiaqiang Ren; Michael Bennett; Nausheen Zia; Sharon Adams; Ena Wang; Joao Ascensao; Geraldine Schechter; David Stroncek
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 5.531

9.  A systematic approach to biomarker discovery; preamble to "the iSBTc-FDA taskforce on immunotherapy biomarkers".

Authors:  Lisa H Butterfield; Mary L Disis; Bernard A Fox; Peter P Lee; Samir N Khleif; Magdalena Thurin; Giorgio Trinchieri; Ena Wang; Jon Wigginton; Damien Chaussabel; George Coukos; Madhav Dhodapkar; Leif Håkansson; Sylvia Janetzki; Thomas O Kleen; John M Kirkwood; Cristina Maccalli; Holden Maecker; Michele Maio; Anatoli Malyguine; Giuseppe Masucci; A Karolina Palucka; Douglas M Potter; Antoni Ribas; Licia Rivoltini; Dolores Schendel; Barbara Seliger; Senthamil Selvan; Craig L Slingluff; David F Stroncek; Howard Streicher; Xifeng Wu; Benjamin Zeskind; Yingdong Zhao; Mai-Britt Zocca; Heinz Zwierzina; Francesco M Marincola
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 5.531

10.  Systemic treatment of xenografts with vaccinia virus GLV-1h68 reveals the immunologic facet of oncolytic therapy.

Authors:  Andrea Worschech; Nanhai Chen; Yong A Yu; Qian Zhang; Zoltan Pos; Stephanie Weibel; Viktoria Raab; Marianna Sabatino; Alessandro Monaco; Hui Liu; Vladia Monsurró; R Mark Buller; David F Stroncek; Ena Wang; Aladar A Szalay; Francesco M Marincola
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.