Literature DB >> 11369269

The development of an EMG-assisted model to assess spine loading during whole-body free-dynamic lifting.

W S. Marras1, K P. Granata.   

Abstract

Low back disorders (LBDs) are the most common and costly occupationally-related compensable conditions facing employers today. Over the years several biomechanical assessment models have been developed that intended to assess the load profile imposed upon the spine during lifting and, thus, intended to facilitate the control of LBD risk in the workplace. Many of these biomechanical models have evolved based upon assumptions about how the trunk musculature respond to loads imposed upon the body during lifting. However, few of these models have been able to accurately predict the co-contraction of the trunk musculature which has been shown to have a major influence on the development of spinal loads. Thus, our understanding of how the spine is loaded under realistic dynamic lifting conditions has been deficient. A biologically-assisted or EMG-assisted model has been developed in our laboratory over the past 15 years which endeavours to overcome these traditional problems. The model has been assessed in the sagittal, coronal, and torsional planes of the body. The model development and performance will be reviewed as well as the benefits for controlling occupationally-related LBDs.

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 11369269     DOI: 10.1016/s1050-6411(97)00006-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol        ISSN: 1050-6411            Impact factor:   2.368


  9 in total

1.  Co-contraction recruitment and spinal load during isometric trunk flexion and extension.

Authors:  Kevin P Granata; Patrick E Lee; Timothy C Franklin
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2005-09-09       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Muscular contributions to dynamic dorsoventral lumbar spine stiffness.

Authors:  Tony S Keller; Christopher J Colloca; Deed E Harrison; Robert J Moore; Robert Gunzburg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Trunk biomechanical models based on equilibrium at a single-level violate equilibrium at other levels.

Authors:  N Arjmand; A Shirazi-Adl; M Parnianpour
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Low-back biomechanics and static stability during isometric pushing.

Authors:  Kevin R Granata; Bradford C Bennett
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.888

5.  Interface stability influences torso muscle recruitment and spinal load during pushing tasks.

Authors:  P J Lee; K P Granata
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Use of a personalized hybrid biomechanical model to assess change in lumbar spine function with a TDR compared to an intact spine.

Authors:  Gregory G Knapik; Ehud Mendel; William S Marras
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Musculoskeletal disorder risk during automotive assembly: current vs. seated.

Authors:  Sue A Ferguson; William S Marras; W Gary Allread; Gregory G Knapik; Riley E Splittstoesser
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.661

8.  Changes of lumbar posture and tissue loading during static trunk bending.

Authors:  Faisal Alessa; Xiaopeng Ning
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.161

9.  Assessment of Whole Body and Local Muscle Fatigue Using Electromyography and a Perceived Exertion Scale for Squat Lifting.

Authors:  Imran Ahmad; Jung-Yong Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.