Literature DB >> 16539898

Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: differences between measurements made manually and with a computerized program.

Carlos Piqué-Vidal1, Ignaci Maled-García, Juanjo Arabi-Moreno, Joan Vila.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to compare angular measurements in the evaluation of hallux valgus deformities using a goniometer and a computerized program to assess degree of concordance between the two methods and determine the reliability of manual measurements.
METHODS: Angles measured included the hallux valgus angle (HVA), the intermetatarsal angle (IMA), the distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA), and the proximal phalangeal articular angle (PPAA), also called the hallux valgus interphalangeus angle or interphalangeal angle. Measurements were made on preoperative weightbearing radiographs in 176 patients with symptomatic hallux valgus. Manual measurements were made with a goniometer by an orthopaedic surgeon. An independent experienced technician used digitized images to perform angular measurements with the Autocad software program (Autodesk Inc., San Rafael, CA).
RESULTS: HVA values obtained with the two techniques were similar. However, significantly higher mean values were obtained with the Autocad for the IMA and PPAA measurements, and higher mean values were obtained for the DMAA measurement with the manual technique. Whereas differences were more or less randomly distributed for the HVA, in the remaining patients, measurements were clearly related to the measurement technique, i.e., for the DMAA, the manual technique had a tendency to show higher values, and for the IMA and PPAA the manual technique showed lower values than the computer. Correlations between both techniques for the different angular measurements were as follows: HVA, -0.179 (p = 0.018); DMMA, -0.294 (p < 0.001); PPAA, -0.876 (p < 0.001); and IMA, -0.661 (p < 0.001). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) showed that the concordance between manual and Autocad angular measurements was excellent for the HVA (ICC = 0.89) and DMAA (ICC = 0.80) and very poor for the PPAA (ICC = 0.11) and IMA (ICC = 0.42).
CONCLUSIONS: Angular measurements made on weightbearing radiographs with the Autocad in patients with hallux valgus deformities were more reliable than those made with a goniometer. Although for large angles, such as HVA and DMAA, results obtained with both measurement techniques were similar. Manual measurements, however, may underestimate the true values of the smaller IMA and PPAA angles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16539898     DOI: 10.1177/107110070602700304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  11 in total

1.  Use of the iPhone for radiographic evaluation of hallux valgus.

Authors:  Tolga Ege; Ozkan Kose; Kenan Koca; Bahtiyar Demiralp; Mustafa Basbozkurt
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Validity of goniometric elbow measurements: comparative study with a radiographic method.

Authors:  Julien Chapleau; Fanny Canet; Yvan Petit; G-Yves Laflamme; Dominique M Rouleau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Length of the first metatarsal and hallux in hallux valgus in the initial stage.

Authors:  Pedro V Munuera; Juan Polo; Jesús Rebollo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Bipartite hallucal sesamoid bones: relationship with hallux valgus and metatarsal index.

Authors:  Pedro V Munuera; Gabriel Domínguez; María Reina; Piedad Trujillo
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2007-09-02       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Reliability of different smartphones measuring the hallux valgus parameters in a new rapid method: a follow-up study.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Chao Zhang; Hao Liang; Jun Zhang; Weiyang Zhong; Zenghui Zhao; Tianji Huang; Xiaoji Luo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  The accuracy and reliability of WebCeph for cephalometric analysis.

Authors:  Yassir A Yassir; Aya R Salman; Sarah A Nabbat
Journal:  J Taibah Univ Med Sci       Date:  2021-09-22

7.  Development of a Manual Measurement Device for Measuring Hallux Valgus Angle in Patients with Hallux Valgus.

Authors:  Guoli Li; Jinsong Shen; Edward Smith; Chetna Patel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  A geometric analysis of hallux valgus: correlation with clinical assessment of severity.

Authors:  Carlos Piqué-Vidal; Joan Vila
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  A comparison of hallux valgus angles assessed with computerised plantar pressure measurements, clinical examination and radiography in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Daniël Mc Janssen; Antal P Sanders; Nick A Guldemond; Joris Hermus; Geert Him Walenkamp; Lodewijk W van Rhijn
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 2.303

10.  Bland-Altman Analysis of Different Radiographic Measurements of the Hallux Valgus Angle and the Intermetatarsal Angle After Distal Osteotomy.

Authors:  Xuhan Cao; Zixing Bai; Chengyi Sun; Jianmin Wen; Xinxiao Lin; Weidong Sun
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 2.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.