Literature DB >> 16539561

Effect of resin-removal methods on enamel and shear bond strength of rebonded brackets.

Neslihan Eminkahyagil1, Ayca Arman, Alev Cetinşahin, Erdem Karabulut.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to determine (1) the effect of different resin-removal methods on shear bond strength (SBS) of rebonded brackets, (2) condition of the enamel surface, (3) time spent to remove resin remnants, and (4) the location of the bond failure. A total of 80 premolars were included in the study. Fifty of them were divided into five groups and bonded using Light Bondtrade mark sealant and Quick Curetrade mark adhesive. Ten of the samples were debonded, and the SBS of the first debonding was calculated. Forty brackets were debonded using pliers and examined by an optical microscope (16x) to determine the location of the bond failure interface, using a modified Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI). The remnant adhesives were cleaned with four methods: (1) low-speed tungsten-carbide bur (TCB), (2) high-speed TCB, (3) Sof-Lex finishing disks, and (4) microetcher. The brackets were rebonded, and a second set of SBS and ARI values were calculated and statistically evaluated. Thirty of the premolars were divided into five groups receiving the same resin-removal methods and examined by scanning electron microscope. Rebonded teeth had a greater SBS than the initial bonding, except in group 4. The rebonded SBS values were similar in groups 1-3, and only group 4 showed a statistical difference. Sof-lex discs were the most time-consuming procedures and left much adhesive remnant. The high-speed TCB was found to be the most hazardous to the enamel. The scarring of enamel after the debonding is inevitable but can be reduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16539561     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0314:EORMOE]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  35 in total

1.  Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of human dental enamel after bracket debonding: a noncontact three-dimensional optical profilometry analysis.

Authors:  Fabiano G Ferreira; Darcy F Nouer; Nelson P Silva; Ivana U Garbui; Lourenço Correr-Sobrinho; Paulo R A Nouer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Laser applications in orthodontics.

Authors:  Somayeh Heidari; Sepideh Torkan
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013

3.  Use of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser for removing remnant adhesive from the enamel surface in rebonding of orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  Katsunori Koide; Satoshi Tanaka; Toshiya Endo
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 2.634

4.  An in vitro comparison of ultraviolet versus white light in the detection of adhesive remnants during orthodontic debonding.

Authors:  Connie Lai; Peter J Bush; Stephen Warunek; David A Covell; Thikriat Al-Jewair
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Single-component orthodontic adhesives: comparison of the clinical and in vitro performance.

Authors:  Ufuk Ok; Sertac Aksakalli; Elif Eren; Nourtzan Kechagia
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Comparison of shear bond strength of rebonded brackets with four methods of adhesive removal.

Authors:  S Yassaei; H Aghili; E KhanPayeh; M Goldani Moghadam
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  Effect of adhesive remnant removal on enamel topography after bracket debonding.

Authors:  Larissa Adrian Meira Cardoso; Heloísa Cristina Valdrighi; Mario Vedovello Filho; Américo Bortolazzo Correr
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

8.  Thermal imaging of the pulp during residual adhesive removal.

Authors:  Gökmen Kurt; Nisa Gül; Özgür Er; Gülşen Çakmak; Emre Bendeş; Veysel Aslantaş
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.938

9.  In vitro antibacterial and remineralizing effect of adhesive containing triazine and niobium pentoxide phosphate inverted glass.

Authors:  Aline Segatto Pires Altmann; Fabrício Mezzomo Collares; Vicente Castelo Branco Leitune; Rodrigo Alex Arthur; Antonio Shigueaki Takimi; Susana Maria Werner Samuel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Shear bond strength evaluation of bonded molar tubes on fluorotic molars.

Authors:  Erika L Silva-Benítez; Veronica Zavala-Alonso; Gabriel A Martinez-Castanon; Juan P Loyola-Rodriguez; Nuria Patiño-Marin; Irene Ortega-Pedrajo; Franklin García-Godoy
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.