Literature DB >> 16537665

Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin with fibrinolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Elliott M Antman1, David A Morrow, Carolyn H McCabe, Sabina A Murphy, Mikhail Ruda, Zygmunt Sadowski, Andrzej Budaj, Jose L López-Sendón, Sema Guneri, Frank Jiang, Harvey D White, Keith A A Fox, Eugene Braunwald.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unfractionated heparin is often used as adjunctive therapy with fibrinolysis in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. We compared a low-molecular-weight heparin, enoxaparin, with unfractionated heparin for this purpose.
METHODS: We randomly assigned 20,506 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction who were scheduled to undergo fibrinolysis to receive enoxaparin throughout the index hospitalization or weight-based unfractionated heparin for at least 48 hours. The primary efficacy end point was death or nonfatal recurrent myocardial infarction through 30 days.
RESULTS: The primary end point occurred in 12.0 percent of patients in the unfractionated heparin group and 9.9 percent of those in the enoxaparin group (17 percent reduction in relative risk, P<0.001). Nonfatal reinfarction occurred in 4.5 percent of the patients receiving unfractionated heparin and 3.0 percent of those receiving enoxaparin (33 percent reduction in relative risk, P<0.001); 7.5 percent of patients given unfractionated heparin died, as did 6.9 percent of those given enoxaparin (P=0.11). The composite of death, nonfatal reinfarction, or urgent revascularization occurred in 14.5 percent of patients given unfractionated heparin and 11.7 percent of those given enoxaparin (P<0.001); major bleeding occurred in 1.4 percent and 2.1 percent, respectively (P<0.001). The composite of death, nonfatal reinfarction, or nonfatal intracranial hemorrhage (a measure of net clinical benefit) occurred in 12.2 percent of patients given unfractionated heparin and 10.1 percent of those given enoxaparin (P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients receiving fibrinolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction, treatment with enoxaparin throughout the index hospitalization is superior to treatment with unfractionated heparin for 48 hours but is associated with an increase in major bleeding episodes. These findings should be interpreted in the context of net clinical benefit. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00077792.). Copyright 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16537665     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa060898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  97 in total

Review 1.  Cost effectiveness of anticoagulation in acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Jaime Latour-Pérez; Eva de-Miguel-Balsa
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Promise of factor Xa inhibition in acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Leong Lee; Derek Chew
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Anticoagulation after subcutaneous enoxaparin is time sensitive in STEMI patients treated with tenecteplase.

Authors:  Robert C Welsh; Cynthia M Westerhout; Christopher E Buller; Blair O'Neill; Phillip Gordon; Paul W Armstrong
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 4.  Drug Treatment of STEMI in the Elderly: Focus on Fibrinolytic Therapy and Insights from the STREAM Trial.

Authors:  Peter R Sinnaeve; Thierry Danays; Kris Bogaerts; Frans Van de Werf; Paul W Armstrong
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 5.  Low molecular weight heparin biosimilars: how much similarity for how much clinical benefit?

Authors:  Ludovic Drouet
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.493

6.  Low-molecular-weight heparins as adjunctive therapy to thrombolytics: extracting the best data.

Authors:  Alison L Bailey; Steven R Steinhubl
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Heparin resistance in acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Jonathan D Rich; John M Maraganore; Edward Young; Rosa-Maria Lidon; Burt Adelman; Paul Bourdon; Supoat Charenkavanich; Jack Hirsh; Pierre Theroux; Christopher P Cannon
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 8.  Non-invasive treatment of ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J B Jones; A Docherty
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.401

9.  Cost-effectiveness of enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin in ST elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing pharmacological reperfusion: a Canadian analysis of the Enoxaparin and Thrombolysis Reperfusion for Acute Myocardial Infarction Treatment - Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (ExTRACT-TIMI) 25 trial.

Authors:  Rober C Welsh; Luc Sauriol; Zugui Zhang; Paul Kolm; Willian S Weintraub; Pierre Theroux
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 10.  Myocardial infarction (ST-elevation).

Authors:  Abel P Wakai
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2009-01-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.