Literature DB >> 19960133

Cost-effectiveness of enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin in ST elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing pharmacological reperfusion: a Canadian analysis of the Enoxaparin and Thrombolysis Reperfusion for Acute Myocardial Infarction Treatment - Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (ExTRACT-TIMI) 25 trial.

Rober C Welsh1, Luc Sauriol, Zugui Zhang, Paul Kolm, Willian S Weintraub, Pierre Theroux.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in conjunction with fibrinolysis in ST elevation myocardial infarction patients within Canada.
DESIGN: Based on the Enoxaparin and Thrombolysis Reperfusion for Acute Myocardial Infarction Treatment - Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (ExTRACT-TIMI) 25 trial, a model was created to analyze the cost-effectiveness of enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin in conjunction with fibrinolysis among ST elevation myocardial infarction patients within Canada. Clinical outcomes were derived from published results of the main trial. Resource use costs were first assessed based on United States Diagnosis-Related Group values for hospitalizations and Current Procedural Terminology codes for outpatient visits and tests. Both were then converted using Canadian local costs. Survival and life expectancy were estimated from Framingham survival data. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was expressed as cost per life year gained.
RESULTS: Through 30 days after random assignment, the primary composite end point favoured the enoxaparin group over the unfractionated heparin group (death or recurrent myocardial infarction rate 9.9% versus 12.0%, P<0.001), and was associated with a modest increased cost of $169.50 ($8,757.00 versus $8,587.50, respectively). Life years gained as a result of treatment with enoxaparin was increased by 0.11 years (P<0.05). Enoxaparin was found to be cost-effective, as indicated by an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $4,930 with a 99% probability of costing less than $20,000.
CONCLUSIONS: Although associated with modest increased direct medication costs, enoxaparin following fibrinolysis improved the clinical efficacy in STEMI patients and increased the life years gained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19960133      PMCID: PMC2807835          DOI: 10.1016/s0828-282x(09)70532-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Cardiol        ISSN: 0828-282X            Impact factor:   5.223


  20 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin as adjunctive therapy to fibrinolysis in ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Pierre Théroux; Robert C Welsh
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Estimating survival for cost-effectiveness analyses: a case study in atherothrombosis.

Authors:  J Jaime Caro; Khajak J Ishak; Kristen Migliaccio-Walle
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.725

3.  Covariance adjustment of survival curves based on Cox's proportional hazards regression model.

Authors:  J Lee; C Yoshizawa; L Wilkens; H P Lee
Journal:  Comput Appl Biosci       Date:  1992-02

Review 4.  Adjusting survival curves for confounders: a review and a new method.

Authors:  F J Nieto; J Coresh
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-05-15       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Comparison of 2 methods for calculating adjusted survival curves from proportional hazards models.

Authors:  W A Ghali; H Quan; R Brant; G van Melle; C M Norris; P D Faris; P D Galbraith; M L Knudtson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-09-26       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  A cardiovascular life history. A life course analysis of the original Framingham Heart Study cohort.

Authors:  A Peeters; A A Mamun; F Willekens; L Bonneux
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Adjusted survival curve estimation using covariates.

Authors:  R W Makuch
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1982

8.  Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin and fibrinolytic therapy for myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation.

Authors:  Marc S Sabatine; Christopher P Cannon; C Michael Gibson; Jose L López-Sendón; Gilles Montalescot; Pierre Theroux; Marc J Claeys; Frank Cools; Karen A Hill; Allan M Skene; Carolyn H McCabe; Eugene Braunwald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Economic evaluation of the use of enoxaparin in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Edith A Nutescu; Karen Steinmetz Pater
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.889

10.  Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients receiving enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin after fibrinolytic therapy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the ExTRACT-TIMI 25 trial.

Authors:  C Michael Gibson; Sabina A Murphy; Gilles Montalescot; David A Morrow; Diego Ardissino; Marc Cohen; Dietrich C Gulba; Oscar H Kracoff; Basil S Lewis; Nathan Roguin; Elliott M Antman; Eugene Braunwald
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Cost effectiveness of anticoagulation in acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Jaime Latour-Pérez; Eva de-Miguel-Balsa
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Review of cost-effectiveness analysis of medical treatment for myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Yanmei Liu; Koustuv Dalal
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2011-04

Review 3.  Economic Evaluation alongside Multinational Studies: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies.

Authors:  Raymond Oppong; Sue Jowett; Tracy E Roberts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Which Costs Matter? Costs Included in Economic Evaluation and their Impact on Decision Uncertainty for Stable Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  James Lomas; Miqdad Asaria; Laura Bojke; Chris P Gale; Gerry Richardson; Simon Walker
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2018-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.