Literature DB >> 16537659

Home haemodialysis-international trends and variation.

Mark S MacGregor1, John W M Agar, Christopher R Blagg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Home haemodialysis (HD) has the best patient outcomes and is the most cost-effective of any dialysis modality, but its use has been declining in many countries.
METHODS: Point prevalence rates of different dialysis modalities and transplantation were obtained from national and regional registries for the most recent available year (2001-03) for 21 high-income and 12 middle-income countries. Relationships with median age and prevalence of diabetic nephropathy, healthcare expenditure and population density were assessed. Long-term trends in the use of home HD during the last two to four decades were obtained for seven countries.
RESULTS: The prevalence of home HD varies from 0 to 58.4 per million population, and varies between countries, more than any other renal replacement therapy (RRT) modality. There is a positive association between the use of peritoneal dialysis and home HD (Spearman's rho = 0.531, P = 0.013), but no correlation with transplantation prevalence. There is a negative correlation with median age of the renal replacement population (rho = -0.552, P = 0.018). There is no association with prevalence of diabetic nephropathy, healthcare expenditure or population density. Temporal trends in home HD prevalence are dramatically different in different countries, with several countries expanding its use in the last few years.
CONCLUSION: The use of home HD varies dramatically between and within countries. The variation cannot be explained by the variation in the use of other RRT modalities, nor by prevalence of diabetic nephropathy, national wealth or population density. The inverse correlation with median age is difficult to explain. Significant expansion of home HD is likely to be possible in most countries, and will be increasingly important as the impressive results of more frequent HD gain credence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16537659     DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfl093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant        ISSN: 0931-0509            Impact factor:   5.992


  22 in total

1.  Home haemodialysis.

Authors:  Christopher R Blagg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-01-05

2.  Choosing to live with home dialysis-patients' experiences and potential for telemedicine support: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Ellen Rygh; Eli Arild; Elin Johnsen; Markus Rumpsfeld
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 2.388

3.  Use of home hemodialysis after peritoneal dialysis technique failure.

Authors:  Davide P Cinà; Niki Dacouris; Mina Kashani; Beth Unana; Ramona Cook; Jason Fung; Julia Delacruz; Aaron P Zaltzman; Philip A McFarlane; Jeffrey Perl
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.756

4.  Recruitment and training for home hemodialysis: experience and lessons from the Nocturnal Dialysis Trial.

Authors:  Mary Pipkin; Paul W Eggers; Brett Larive; Michael V Rocco; John B Stokes; Rita S Suri; Robert S Lockridge
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 5.  Intensive home haemodialysis: benefits and barriers.

Authors:  Karthik K Tennankore; Christopher T Chan; Simon P Curran
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 28.314

6.  Dialysis modality choices among chronic kidney disease patients: identifying the gaps to support patients on home-based therapies.

Authors:  Ai-Hua Zhang; Joanne M Bargman; Charmaine E Lok; Eveline Porter; Maria Mendez; Dimitrios G Oreopoulos; Christopher T Chan
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Effect of an in-hospital chronic kidney disease education program among patients with unplanned urgent-start dialysis.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Rioux; Harpaul Cheema; Joanne M Bargman; Diane Watson; Christopher T Chan
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  Is replacement modality choice knowledge important in the non-renal multidisciplinary team? Experience from a single UK centre.

Authors:  Fatima Abdelaal; Hatem Ali; Jyoti Baharani
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.659

9.  Patient-perceived barriers to the adoption of nocturnal home hemodialysis.

Authors:  Joseph A Cafazzo; Kevin Leonard; Anthony C Easty; Peter G Rossos; Christopher T Chan
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 8.237

10.  The beliefs and expectations of patients and caregivers about home haemodialysis: an interview study.

Authors:  Allison Tong; Suetonia Palmer; Braden Manns; Jonathan C Craig; Marinella Ruospo; Letizia Gargano; David W Johnson; Jörgen Hegbrant; Måns Olsson; Steven Fishbane; Giovanni F M Strippoli
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.